Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Restraint of trade clauses need to be considered at the start and end of employment, writes Paul O’Halloran.
There are a lot of legal talents moving firms in the legal market at present. One of the most stressful aspects of changing firms for senior lawyers is being accused of breaching post-employment restraints in employment contracts or partnership agreements.
Lawyers and accountants frequently ask me about the enforceability of their post-employment restraints. There is a myth that all such clauses are unenforceable. This is not true, but many of them are poorly drafted and defective.
Purpose of post-employment restraints
Employment restraints of trade can discourage employees from leaving their positions by restricting their ability to work in their chosen field for a period after their employment has ended. While it depends on the facts of each individual case, a carefully considered and drafted restraint of trade clause in a contract of employment may achieve this outcome.
Most of the clauses I tend to see are invalid and unenforceable because legal advice was not obtained on this technical area of law at the time of entering into the contract, or the restraint is a boilerplate that was not specifically drafted for the individual to whom it purports to apply.
Terminology
The terminology in restraint clauses can be confusing to the unacquainted. Here are common terms:
What makes a post-employment restraint clause enforceable?
Restraints of trade are not automatically enforceable. The starting position for such provisions is that they are void as against public policy. A court will uphold a restraint of trade clause as valid only if the former employer seeking to enforce it can establish that the restraint is no wider than reasonably necessary to protect the legitimate proprietary interests of the former employer.
Key factors that will be considered when determining the validity of the restraint provisions include:
Some of the common scenarios that may render a restraint clause unenforceable or more difficult to apply include:
Generally, there is a 50-50 chance that a restraint will be upheld if an injunction is sought against a departing employee. A 2016 empirical academic study of the outcome of restraint of trade cases in Australian courts between 1989 and 2012, conducted by Hui Xian Chia and Ian Ramsay, found that employers were successful in enforcing an employment restraint of trade in 46.2 per cent of all cases.
Get advice
Restraint of trade clauses need to be considered at the start of employment (for law firms) and at the end of employment (for departing lawyers).
Firms or individual lawyers wishing to determine the enforceability of restraint of trade clauses should seek legal advice before making threats of legal action, as this is absolutely one area of the law where the individual facts of each case really do make a difference.
Paul O’Halloran is an employment partner at Dentons Australia.