You have 2 free articles left this month.
Become a Premium Member to enjoy a wide range of benefits.
You have 2 free articles left this month.

Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
SME Law

Financial complaints reforms ‘flawed’, says Creevey Russell

Queensland-based firm Creevey Russell Lawyers says reforms made to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority are in need of urgent amendment.

June 19, 2019 By Jerome Doraisamy
Dan Creevey

Source: creeveyrussell.com.au/the-team/

expand image

The reforms made to AFCA, as a result of the Hayne Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry, will be effective from 1 July 2019, Creevey Russell principal Dan Creevey said, extending the normal six-year limitation period to commence litigation by permitting AFCA to deal with matters arising after 1 January 2008.

But this extension in the jurisdiction of AFCA, which commenced as an external disputes resolution scheme last November in place of the Financial Ombudsman Service, the Credit and Investments Ombudsman and Superannuation Complaints Tribunal, is limited to credit facilities not exceeding $5 million, Mr Creevey said, meaning businesses and farmers with facilities greater than $5 million “will now be worse off”.

“We have raised this matter with the Department of Treasury which is dealing with this area of post-Hayne reforms and they have advised they are considering whether and how they will deal with this gap,” he said.

“Our view is that, as a matter of common sense, it would be inconsistent to not implement an extension of the normal six-year limitation period similar to the extensions of time in relation to credit facilities under $5 million under AFCA.

“Aggrieved businesses and farmers with facilities over $5 million are likely to have suffered greater losses. They may well now be in a worse financial position than parties with credit facilities under $5 million who are able to seek compensation through AFCA.”

Mr Creevey said it would be inconsistent and inequitable to not provide a similar extension to these businesses and farmers.

“Additionally, these parties would need to fund their own actions so that there would be no cost to the government. We think this matter needs to be raised with politicians by aggrieved farmers, and on their behalf by bodies such as the National Farmers Federation, to ensure this unfair and unjust gap is closed. We have notified the NFF of this issue of concern.”

jerome.doraisamy@momentummedia.com.au

Jerome Doraisamy

Jerome Doraisamy is the managing editor of Lawyers Weekly and HR Leader. He is also the author of The Wellness Doctrines book series, an admitted solicitor in New South Wales, and a board director of the Minds Count Foundation.

You can email Jerome at: jerome.doraisamy@momentummedia.com.au 

Comments (0)
    Avatar
    Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
    The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
     
    The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
    The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
    Posting as
    You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member today
    Got a tip for us?
    If you have any news tips or stories to share, feel free to send them our way.
    Momentum Media Logo
    Most Innovative Company