Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

‘Rigorous, transparent and merits-based’ appointments get LCA tick of approval

The nation’s largest legal body is standing behind a Labor vow to reinstate rigorous, transparent and merits-based judicial appointments before this year’s federal election.

user iconGrace Ormsby 04 February 2019 Politics
Arthur Moses
expand image

Calling the stance a promotion of greater transparency and accountability, the Law Council of Australia has also backed indications from the federal opposition that legal aid funding will be boosted if the ALP is elected into government.

Under the proposed changes, judicial positions in the Federal Court of Australia, Family Court of Australia and Federal Circuit Court of Australia and appointments to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal would be publicly advertised, the LCA said, with an independent panel providing potential appointee shortlists to the Attorney-General.

While appointments would remain an Attorney-General and cabinet responsibility, any decisions made outside of this process will need to be reported and explained in Parliament, it was noted.

The Law Council’s president Arthur Moses SC said the proposal would enhance transparency, reinforcing the independence and integrity of these bodies.

“The current appointments process is shrouded in mystery, which can diminish public confidence in the judiciary and justice system,” Mr Moses said.

“The federal opposition’s proposal would promote greater transparency and public confidence that all appointments are based on merit and that those who have the qualities required for appointment are fairly considered,” he continued.

Stating that “such a system would safeguard the quality and improve the diversity of appointments,” Mr Moses noted that “a judiciary that reflects the community it serves better enhances public confidence in the administration of justice, including respect for the rule of law”.

Recommendations for appointments will be sought from stakeholders, including the legal profession, Mr Moses said, noting that the Law Council would welcome an opportunity for participation.

After the Labor Party announcement was made, former Attorney-General and current shadow attorney-general Mark Dreyfus took to Twitter, noting again that “Labor will restore the transparent, accountable judicial appointments process we had when last in government, and extend a similar process to the AAT for the first time.”

He said all vacancies will be advertised, and a shortlist put together by an independent panel.

“The selection panel will be instructed to consider the need for our judiciary and AAT to be better reflective of the Australian community,” he continued.

Flagging that appointments of women to the federal judiciary are at a low 30 per cent under this government, Mr Dreyfus urged “we can and must do better”.

Mr Dreyfus also stated his commitment to “increasing the Commonwealth’s contribution to legal assistance”.

The Law Council considered this as one of its own long-standing priorities.

In response, Mr Moses highlighted that the Commonwealth government’s contribution to legal aid funding has dropped from 55 per cent in 1996–97 to 32 per cent in 2017–18.

“As a result, while 14 per cent of Australians live below the poverty line, legal aid is available to just eight per cent of the population,” Mr Moses noted.

“The Law Council’s Justice Project has found, due to chronic underfunding, every year tens of thousands of Australians are being denied access to justice.”

“This must change,” he said.

It comes after the NSW Law Society’s new president, Elizabeth Espinosa, said that preparing for the future involves investing in solicitors as advocates to show they are “equipped to serve as future advocates”

 

 

Comments (8)
  • Avatar
    The NSW Bar Council has a sorry history of cronyism going back many years. Not all the appointments from those ranks are tainted,some are obviously on merit & would pass any “ pub test “ . Others however have been truely laughable but when the rank & file ,who have to appear in front of these plodders, ask the obvious questions we get “ they have done a lot for the profession “. Garbage ,they worked the system, networked & sucked up to the right people,were members of the right chambers/ local branch.And the Executive of the Bar Council were at a minimum passive validators of it. Gutless.
    2
  • Avatar
    The USA system of open hearings for Supreme Court appointments seems a good idea. Let's try it here.
    1
  • Avatar
    Yes but transparency does not apply to High Court appointments. Do they put an ad in the paper for those? Proof that at some level transparency theory fails. The least they could do is have a Senate Committee grill the applicants about whether they said something rude to a man/woman (lets be fair) as an undergraduate, 30 years ago.
    2
  • Avatar
    How many Bar Council members have leveraged that membership into a spot on the District Court or even the Supreme Court of the ACT ? How many Liberal Party apparatchiks have been handed a spot on the Federal Circuit Court ? All in the time that Arthur Moses was part of the executive of the Bar Council. So now it’s a new broom!
    1
  • Avatar
    I agree 100%. Last year's intake were by in large just mates of the SILK selection committee.
    3
  • Avatar
    This is badly needed. Really sick and tired of seeing cronies of the current party in power showing up as AAT Members (qualifications? experience?) and making critical decisions that affect people's lives without any sort of meaningful work experience or training in the area they are making decisions in. Being an AAT Member shouldn't be a political prize for the lucky or connected, it should be a privileged position for people who have earned it through work experience, knowledge and training.
    1
  • Avatar
    I support Labor's vow. Some of the solicitor appointments of late are questionable at best. But how about some transparency for the NSW Silk selection too?
    3
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!