You have2 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 2 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.

Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

Lawyers say NSW government should support pill testing

Legal advocates are pushing the Berejiklian government to implement trials for testing of illicit drugs at music festivals, saying criminal and law enforcement responses are failing.

user iconJerome Doraisamy 25 January 2019 Politics
Gladys Berejiklian
expand image

In a letter sent to NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian yesterday, Australian Lawyers Alliance called for pill testing to be introduced, saying the priority “must be to avoid deaths and minimise harm”.

“Criminal and law enforcement responses to increased usage by young people of illicit drugs at music festivals has failed to prevent the deaths of several young people who have taken illicit substances in these environments,” ALA wrote.

“The ALA considers that punitive law enforcement approaches to this issue are not appropriate and that the government needs to consider evidence-based harm minimisation measures that prioritise the health and safety of festival goers rather than criminal and legal measures.”

“The reality is that young people will experiment with drugs and they are being needlessly exposed to death or physical and mental harm when we have the ability to decrease this risk through pill testing,” said Ngaire Watson, barrister and medical law spokesperson for the ALA.

“This is a health problem not a legal problem, and the main focus of legal strategies should be to encourage positive health outcomes.”

ALA’s stance backs that of the Royal Australian College of Physicians, which argued that pill testing within such trials should be conducted in purpose-designed facilities by appropriately qualified technical specialists and should be accompanied by advice and information to allow festival goers to make informed choices.

“These facilities also offer an opportunity for medical professionals to provide advice to young people about the risks of drug taking,” said Ms Watson.

Criminal justice spokesperson for the ALA Greg Barns added that government and festival organisers have a duty to ensure a safe environment for patrons.

“Simply saying no to drugs does not work and the government should listen to health experts, not police, on this issue. The ACT pill testing exercise last year was very successful and, of course, in Europe they allow testing,” he said.

“At every festival police use sniffer dogs and make arrests. Young people then are shunted through the court system. This approach does not reduce demand for drugs and does not recognise the reality of drug use at music festivals.”

Addressing Ms Berejiklian, ALA wrote that it “strongly encourages your government, if re-elected, to commit to the implementation of a carefully designed pill testing trial, similar to what has been implemented in the ACT.”

Elsewhere, Australian Lawyers for Human Rights said it supports a human rights-based approach to drug laws and policies.

"We urge the NSW Government to listen to and act on the advice of expert organisations such as Harm Reduction International. Laws and policies relating to illicit drugs must have harm reduction as their central focus and should aim to minimise the negative health and legal impacts associated with drug use," said ALHR president Kerry Weste.

"Harm reduction also necessarily involves including initiatives such as drug consumption rooms, needle and syringe programmes and drug checking as part of a holistic approach to drug policy. Approaches such as these are cost-effective, evidence-based and have a positive impact on individual and community health."

New president of the Law Society of NSW, Elizabeth Espinosa, took a similar approach. In a statement to Lawyers Weekly, she said "any death occasioned by illicit drugs is one too many", and that there are "no simple fixes" to what is a very difficult and complex issue.

“We should continue to discuss the best policy settings to address illicit drug use in the community. We welcome the input of public health experts in any debate around pill testing, or other harm reduction measures," she said. 

“If a model emerges, we stand ready to consult on the legal issues that might arise, including the complex issues of liability. Most of the debate around pill testing revolves around public health issues and the efficacy of testing, both literally in terms of whether the tests themselves are fast and accurate enough, and more generally as to what impact testing being present has on drug use by members of the community.”

Jerome Doraisamy

Jerome Doraisamy

Jerome Doraisamy is the managing editor of Lawyers Weekly and HR Leader. He is also the author of The Wellness Doctrines book series, an admitted solicitor in New South Wales, and a board director of the Minds Count Foundation.

You can email Jerome at: jerome.doraisamy@momentummedia.com.au 

Comments (6)
  • Avatar
    Pill testing is basic common sense. It does not encourage people to take pills, it simply gives them an avenue to run some checks before taking them ... it's never been any kind of guarantee that an illicit drug is safe to take and it never will be. If your child was going to take this pill, irrespective of your wise reasons not to, would you rather they tested it first or just took it?
    2
  • Avatar
    Is Espinosa really trying to do a Pauline Wright and speak for all lawyers again on controversial issues without canvassing her members?
    4
    • Avatar
      Give her a break, all she said was she doesn't like people dying and there were no simple solutions. I mean, who does like people dying, Kim Yong Un? What would be the point in canvassing members. They couldn't agree on whether night follows day. Most of them are just life support systems for Australian real estate and private school tuition fees.
      -4
  • Avatar
    Agree. There is a dearth of experiences/parenting for youth to be enabled to enjoy life/events without the need for toxic chemical additives. Only the 'dealers/suppliers' win from brainwashing youth into doubting their capability of experiencing unchemicalised fun.
    -1
  • Avatar
    Drugs are a toxic substance. There are consequences to taking them. If the above approach is implemented (even with the education offered at point of testing), are we then implicitly saying 'these are Ok, you are safe'? 'Clean' drugs still kill - dehydration, overdose etc etc. What will the 'outraged' say when deaths continue after pill testing is in place. Don't blame pollies, police etc when there is a lack of personal responsibility of the consequences of taking toxic substances.
    1
    • Avatar
      People take this stuff anyway, but it would be good to allow people to make a more informed decision about what drugs they take. Informing yourself is part of taking personal responsibility.
      1
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!