Advertisement
Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

Gender pay gaps getting worse in Aussie law firms

Australia’s biggest law firms had their gender pay data exposed for the second year in a row. Here, Lawyers Weekly takes a look into the new figures and reveals whether those gaps got better or worse.

user iconNaomi Neilson and Grace Robbie 04 March 2025 Big Law
expand image

The Workplace Gender Equality Agency’s (WGEA) data for 2023–24 revealed that just under half of the 62 major law firms with comparable data to the previous reporting year had a worse gender pay gap (GPG).

Under the Workplace Gender Equality Act 2012, workplaces with 100 or more employees are required to provide their GPG data. This year, more than 80 legal workplaces disclosed that information.

Spruson & Ferguson had one of the biggest GPG increases, with its median base salary jumping from 49.9 to 58.3 per cent. Its median total remuneration GPG also increased from 53.3 to 61.7 per cent.

The firm’s managing director, Simon Potter, told Lawyers Weekly this was driven by “historic trends”, like an over-representation of women in non-fee-earning roles and low levels in STEM-qualified careers – which he explained was a requirement for patent attorneys.

“Closing the gap is a strategic priority we are actively addressing through our gender equity and equality strategy. In the last year, we have formalised a 40:40:20 gender balance target and made significant changes to our parental leave policy,” Potter said.

Also at the end of this scale are McInnes Wilson, Meridian Lawyers, Shine Lawyers, and Cornwalls. Much like Spruson & Ferguson, the latter increased its median base salary GPG from 23.6 to 49.1 per cent, and median total remuneration jumped from 32 to 48.6 per cent.

Several firms reported a significant decrease in their GPG results, including Johnson Winter Slattery, College of Law, Piper Alderman, Russell Kennedy, McCabes, and Macpherson Kelley.

Macpherson Kelley’s figures were among the highest in the previous year’s results, with it reporting a median base salary GPG of 39.7 per cent and a median total remuneration of 41 per cent. In the new figures, this decreased to 36.3 and 37.2 per cent, respectively.

While still high, it meant the firm was no longer at the worse end of the scale. The firm told Lawyers Weekly it was “deeply committed to taking deliberate steps to positively influence the gender pay gap”.

By July 2028, Macpherson Kelley said it intended to have women comprise 50 per cent of the principal lawyer positions and will maintain initiatives such as flexible work, paid parental leave, and female-focused leadership development programs.

In response to the WEGA data, newly appointed Law Society of NSW president Jennifer Ball expressed that, with women comprising half of the solicitor profession, “the achievement of gender equality in the workplace makes sense both as a value and a business imperative”.

Ball emphasised that the NSW Law Society “continues to support and encourage the profession to demonstrate commitment and leadership on this front”.

For the first time, WGEA also provided average GPG figures for base salary and total remuneration, as well as a breakdown of the percentage of women in lowest to highest seniority levels.

On average, there is a 19.3 per cent base salary GPG and a 19.73 per cent total remuneration GPG across all 81 firms.

However, it is important to note that, from the outset, there are several flaws in WGEA’s data that make the figures appear different than they may be in reality. For an explainer of why that may be the case for some, Lawyers Weekly spoke to Mary Wooldridge and two affected firms.

Joining Spruson & Ferguson with the highest GPGs were Jones Day, Coleman Greig, Davies Collison Cave, and Meridian Lawyers.

Speaking to Lawyers Weekly, Jones Day said the methodology “ignores that different jobs have different pay ranges” because women “are not only thriving within Jones Day, they are leading the firm”.

“In Australia, women hold 87 per cent of Jones Day’s staff positions and, more specifically, 100 per cent of our secretarial positions. These administrative roles generally command lower compensation compared to lawyer positions,” a spokesperson for the firm said.

In addition to the flaw in the data, Coleman Greig attributed the gap to senior consultant demographics and shifts. Currently, women make up just over 40 per cent in the firm’s upper quartile, and 93 per cent in its lower-middle quartile. Similar figures are shown in the table below.

“At Coleman Greig, we recognise that achieving true gender pay equality requires continuous commitment and action,” the firm said.

“While the WGEA gender pay gap results highlight important progress, we acknowledge that there is still work to be done, and we are dedicated to driving meaningful, measurable change.”

When viewed on a whole, Coleman Greig’s 43 per cent pales in comparison to the 21 per cent of women in Cornwalls’ upper quartile. At the other end of the scale, the Environmental Defenders Office has 81 per cent women in its top ranks.

The average and median results appear below. The “NC” in the median table refers to data that is “non-comparable” to last year’s results.

FIRM Average base salary GPG (%) Average total remuneration GPG (%) Total workforce women (%) Upper quartile women (%) Upper-middle quartile women (%) Lower-middle quartile women (%) Lower quartile women (%)
Knowmore Legal Services 0.2 0.2 78% 76% 75% 80% 80%
Lawyers on Demand 1.6 3.8 65% 68% 74% 62% 58%
Piper Alderman 2.4 4.1 62% 63% 54% 63% 70%
Ashurst 4 4.5 60% 61% 54% 62% 64%
Baker McKenzie 12.6 12.4 58% 60% 61% 53% 60%
Environmental Defenders Office 5.3 5.3 82% 81% 82% 84% 81%
Maddocks 5.2 5.4 63% 63% 66% 65% 57%
Law Society of NSW 7 6 63% 69% 47% 68% 67%
Norton Rose Fulbright 6.3 6.3 66% 64% 55% 68% 74%
HFW 8.8 8.3 62% 61% 48% 59% 79%
Aboriginal Legal Service (NSW/ACT) Limited 8.2 8.5 73% 58% 77% 77% 79%
Gilbert + Tobin 7.5 8.5 63% 56% 59% 66% 72%
Arnold Bloch Leibler 9.3 8.9 64% 65% 57% 61% 73%
Holding Redlich 10.1 9.5 77% 74% 75% 79% 79%
King & Wood Mallesons 10.3 9.5 66% 60% 63% 67% 73%
Dentons 9.8 9.7 63% 60% 51% 69% 72%
Law in Order 9.9 9.9 41% 32% 41% 38% 52%
Sparke Helmore 9.9 10.5 74% 66% 73% 77% 78%
Hall & Wilcox 10.6 10.6 74% 72% 71% 81% 73%
Mills Oakley 9.1 10.6 72% 65% 71% 83% 68%
Addisons 11.6 11.2 73% 63% 68% 80% 80%
Allens 10.8 11.3 67% 63% 61% 68% 75%
Russell Kennedy 12.6 11.3 65% 63% 63% 76% 60%
Colin Biggers & Paisley 10.3 11.6 70% 61% 64% 82% 72%
College of Law 10.3 11.6 66% 57% 63% 68% 76%
Turks Legal 12 12 73% 61% 78% 75% 78%
MinterEllison 12.5 12.8 70% 62% 66% 72% 80%
Pinsent Masons 12.9 12.8 70% 61% 80% 67% 71%
A&O Shearman 10.5 12.9 67% 60% 69% 70% 69%
Carter Newell 11.7 13.3 74% 69% 78% 74% 76%
Kennedys (Australasia) Partnership 14.7 13.8 62% 62% 69% 62% 56%
Clifford Chance 15.1 14 48% 37% 56% 32% 68%
Clyde & Co 11.3 14 69% 57% 63% 79% 78%
Hicksons 15.9 14.1 72% 65% 74% 83% 67%
Clayton Utz 12.4 14.2 65% 56% 66% 69% 69%
HWL Ebsworth 14.9 14.7 69% 59% 66% 79% 70%
Hamilton Locke 9.5 14.8 55% 51% 43% 58% 67%
Johnson Winter Slattery 16.4 15.1 69% 65% 61% 78% 72%
Barry Nilsson 15.3 15.4 75% 67% 72% 87% 72%
DLA Piper 16 15.4 67% 58% 62% 68% 79%
Queensland Law Society 16.3 16 72% 60% 73% 87% 69%
Aboriginal Legal Service of Western Australia Limited 16.9 16.7 71% 57% 70% 82% 76%
K&L Gates 17.1 16.9 65% 54% 58% 77% 72%
Herbert Smith Freehills 17.3 17.1 65% 56% 59% 64% 79%
Cowell Clarke 17.3 17.3 70% 59% 74% 87% 62%
Thomson Geer 15.5 17.5 67% 53% 70% 76% 69%
Avant Law 15.3 17.6 74% 53% 80% 87% 74%
Moray & Agnew 18.3 17.7 73% 60% 79% 79% 75%
Corrs Chambers Westgarth 18.1 17.8 66% 59% 61% 74% 72%
Makinson D’Apice 18.5 18.5 77% 68% 70% 89% 80%
Thomson Reuters 16.5 18.9 56% 42% 51% 63% 67%
Dye & Durham 19.5 19.5 51% 30% 52% 56% 65%
Maurice Blackburn 20.5 20.5 77% 64% 78% 85% 82%
Gadens 18.6 20.9 63% 63% 60% 65% 66%
White & Case 20.2 20.9 65% 51% 60% 74% 72%
Ligeti Services 24 22.8 67% 61% 69% 65% 73%
Lander & Rogers 24.3 22.9 72% 59% 74% 74% 82%
Wotton + Kearney 23.1 23.2 64% 48% 66% 72% 72%
Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Legal Service (Qld) 24 23.8 61% 32% 62% 70% 80%
Slater & Gordon 22.6 23.9 76% 61% 77% 84% 83%
Shine Lawyers 24.5 24.1 75% 59% 78% 82% 81%
Eventus Lawyers 27.8 26.6 67% 46% 67% 75% 79%
HopgoodGanim Lawyers 29.4 28.1 65% 47% 67% 74% 73%
McCullough Robertson 30.2 28.7 71% 56% 73% 78% 77%
Lavan 27.5 29 74% 55% 72% 77% 91%
Bartier Perry 29.9 29.5 66% 35% 74% 86% 69%
Griffith Hack 30 30.1 68% 44% 59% 89% 79%
Gilchrist Connell 10.5 10.0 78% 68% 81% 84% 78%
Galilee Solicitors 32.1 32.1 65% 38% 71% 82% 71%
Macpherson Kelley 27.8 32.8 54% 36% 53% 64% 64%
McCabes 33.4 32.8 66% 48% 56% 85% 75%
Arnold Thomas & Becker 29.2 36.8 81% 57% 89% 89% 89%
Fragomen (Australia) 32.7 37.5 74% 62% 74% 76% 86%
McInnes Wilson 39.3 39.7 66% 38% 83% 69% 75%
Hunt & Hunt Lawyers 40.4 40.3 79% 42% 92% 92% 88%
Cornwalls 46.4 43.9 59% 21% 61% 70% 86%
QANTM Intellectual Property 44 44 68% 42% 61% 86% 83%
Meridian Lawyers 46 45.5 70% 51% 68% 81% 81%
Davies Collison Cave 45.6 45.6 72% 44% 74% 91% 79%
Coleman Greig 49.4 48.4 68% 43% 68% 93% 69%
Jones Day 51.2 49.6 66% 41% 56% 73% 94%
Spruson & Ferguson 49.9 52 68% 21% 59% 100% 91%

FIRM 2025: Median base salary gap (%) 2024: Median base salary gap (%) 2025: Median total remuneration gap (%) 2024: Median total remuneration gap (%) Progress
Baker McKenzie 14.7 12.7 15.4 17.5 Improved
Kennedys (Australasia) Partnership -6.6 N/A -7.3 N/A N/A
Pinsent Masons -2 -3.6 -3.2 -5.1 N/A
Lawyers on Demand -5.3 20.2 -3 21.2 Improved
Environmental Defenders Office 0 N/A 0 N/A N/A
Knowmore Legal Service 0 N/A 0 N/A N/A
College of Law 1.9 9.7 0.6 12.3 Improved
Carter Newell 5.6 -6.4 3.8 -6.4 Declined
Dentons 4.5 7.1 4.1 7.1 Improved
Arnold Bloch Leibler 4.5 8 4.5 8.7 Improved
Ashurst 5.3 12 4.9 13.6 Improved
A&O Shearman 6.2 N/A 5.6 N/A N/A
Dye & Durham 7 N/A 7 N/A N/A
Gilchrist Connell 5.8 7.9 4.7 7.2 Improved
Maddocks 7.9 8.9 7.9 8 Improved
Aboriginal Legal Service of Western Australia Limited 15 N/A 8 N/A N/A
Clifford Chance 3.1 12.9 8.1 25.7 Improved
Johnson Winter Slattery 8.1 11.9 8.1 12.1 Improved
Cowell Clarke 8.5 N/A 8.5 N/A N/A
Law Society of NSW 12.5 24.2 8.8 13.9 Improved
Russell Kennedy 5.7 21.8 8.9 24.8 Improved
Mills Oakley 6.1 11.6 9.1 15.3 Improved
Turks Legal 9.4 34.9 9.4 34.9 Improved
Holding Redlich 9.5 2.1 9.5 2.1 Declined
Ligeti Services 9.8 N/A 9.8 N/A N/A
Allens 10.1 9.4 10.4 9.8 Declined
Hicksons 5 0 10.5 2 Declined
Piper Alderman 8.1 16.4 11 16.4 Improved
Norton Rose Fulbright 11 11.7 11.2 12.8 Improved
Gadens 13 7 11.2 5.3 Declined
Hall & Wilcox 9.5 7.9 11.5 7.2 Declined
Clayton Utz 10.1 N/A 11.9 N/A N/A
Law in Order 13.4 12 12 9.8 Declined
Sparke Helmore 8.6 11.8 13.2 11.8 Improved
Moray & Agnew 14.4 8.2 13.3 7.9 Declined
Gilbert + Tobin 11.4 7.9 13.5 9.2 Declined
King & Wood Mallesons 13.4 11.8 14.6 12.3 Declined
Aboriginal Legal Service (NSW/ACT) Limited 12.8 9.9 15 9.8 Improved
DLA Piper 15.2 15.3 15.2 17 Improved
Avant Law 12.8 20.2 15.7 21.6 Improved
Fragomen (Australia) 16 13.8 15.8 15.6 Declined
Corrs Chambers Westgarth 17.7 22.2 16 19 Improved
Herbert Smith Freehills 13.7 17.3 16.2 15.6 Improved
Queensland Law Society 16.2 8 16.2 8 Declined
Thomson Geer 14.3 16.1 16.7 17.1 Improved
MinterEllison 15.8 18.1 17 18.6 Improved
Clyde & Co 15.8 18.6 17.8 22.9 Improved
HWL Ebsworth 18 11.1 18 11.1 Declined
Addisons 18.7 N/A 18.3 N/A N/A
Galilee Solicitors 18.5 N/A 18.5 N/A N/A
McCullough Robertson 18.5 11.3 19.3 12.7 Declined
K&L Gates 19.5 15.3 19.5 15.3 Declined
HFW 20.3 9.7 20.4 14.5 Declined
Lander & Rogers 21.3 25 21.2 25 Improved
Barry Nilsson 22.9 22 21.2 21.6 Declined
Eventus Lawyers 23.8 N/A 22.1 N/A N/A
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Service (Qld) 27.9 21.7 22.2 19.9 Declined
McCabes 23.1 36.6 23.4 26.6 Improved
Colin Biggers & Paisley 22.6 N/A 23.5 N/A N/A
Makinson D’Apice 24.4 N/A 24.4 N/A N/A
Hamilton Locke 19.5 N/A 24.9 N/A N/A
Thomson Reuters 24 25.5 25 28.5 Improved
Wotton + Kearney 28.1 30 25 29.4 Improved
McInnes Wilson 29.5 24 29.9 28.3 Declined
White & Case 33.3 N/A 31 N/A N/A
HopgoodGanim Lawyers 31 30.8 31.3 29.4 Declined
Maurice Blackburn 33.2 31.7 31.4 30.7 Declined
Slater & Gordon 32.4 33 31.7 31.3 Improved
Shine Lawyers 31.5 25.5 32.8 24.9 Declined
Lavan 28 42.3 33.4 42.4 Improved
Griffith Hack 33.6 42.3 35 45.2 Improved
Arnold Thomas & Blocker 35.5 N/A 37 N/A N/A
Macpherson Kelley 36.3 39.7 37.2 41 Improved
QANTM Intellectual Property 39.6 50.1 39.6 50.1 Improved
Hunt & Hunt Lawyers 39.5 N/A 39.9 N/A N/A
Davies Collison Cave 40.2 N/A 40.2 N/A N/A
Bartier Perry 42.6 50 42.9 50 Improved
Jones Day 44.6 38.5 44.6 38.5 Declined
Coleman Greig 43.5 48 45.1 47.9 Improved
Meridian Lawyers 47 31 48.6 32 Declined
Cornwalls 49.1 23.6 49.1 30.4 Declined
Spruson & Ferguson 58.3 37.6 61.7 26.6 Declined
Australian Business Lawyers N/A 28.7 N/A 28.6 N/A
Best Wilson Buckley Family Law N/A 25.5 N/A 24.9 N/A
Blue Rock Law N/A 7.4 N/A 7 N/A
Carr & Co Divorce and Family N/A 25.5 N/A 24.9 N/A
Cooper Grace Ward N/A 8.1 N/A 8.6 N/A
Employsure N/A -12.8 N/A 0 N/A
Mason Black Lawyers N/A 3.2 N/A 4.2 N/A
SB Law N/A 25.5 N/A 24.9 N/A
Sciaccas Lawyers N/A 25.5 N/A 24.9 N/A
Sphere Legal N/A 1.2 N/A 1.2 N/A
TG Legal and Information N/A 16.1 N/A 17.1 N/A

How firms improved their gender pay gaps

When comparing median figures, Russell Kennedy had one of the most impressive improvements, having decreased its base salary from 21.8 to 5.7 per cent, and its total remuneration from 24.8 to 8.9 per cent.

A spokesperson said progress was achieved “through a sustained effort over a number of years” and they were “proud of the progress we’ve made, but acknowledge that there is always more work to be done”.

In 2024, Russell Kennedy’s female principal partner numbers reached 50 per cent, which represents a growth from the 28 per cent in 2017.

There are ongoing reviews of remuneration and promotion, along with leadership programs and opportunities, improvement to flexible work policies, and active engagement with external frameworks.

“This outstanding result has been achieved through having a framework, setting targets, having appropriate policies and being accountable. The strategy and the work of the Gender Equality Committee complements important work done by other initiatives and committees to support broader diversity, equality and inclusion,” it said.

Similarly, Clifford Chance’s median base salary dropped from 12.9 to 3.1 per cent, and its total remuneration from 25.7 to 8.1 per cent.

Richard Gordon, managing partner, said the firm was pleased to see the results reflect the firm’s “ongoing commitment” to accelerating change towards gender parity by creating equal opportunities.

“They validate our efforts in implementing industry-leading initiatives that enhance our ability to attract, retain and develop talent. One of these initiatives is Accelerate, our employee affinity group, which focuses on fostering an inclusive culture and advancing gender parity,” Gordon said.

Mills Oakley also enjoyed a marked improvement on its GPG, with the median base salary decreasing from 11.6 to 6.1 per cent, and its median total remuneration dropping from 15.3 to 9.1 per cent.

A spokesperson for the firm said a key focus of its strategy is to foster an environment that supports a balanced representation in leadership, with 67 per cent of women in key management personnel positions.

“Improving gender equality is something we focus on every day through our talent-attractive practices, performance and promotion process, remuneration reviews and by creating safe and inclusive environments,” the spokesperson said.

Baker McKenzie’s median total remuneration also decreased from 17.5 per cent in the previous reporting period to 12.4 per cent.

National managing partner Anne-Marie Allgrove said the firm integrated “deliberate measures” to ensure equitable pay for equivalent roles and remained committed to addressing the GPG.

“Our Australian corporate-wide gender pay gap … is explained by the fact that we (as with other law firms) have a large number of women in legal support and business support roles. We are continually committed to addressing this gap through structural and other initiatives,” Allgrove told Lawyers Weekly.

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!