Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

Bernard Collaery case slammed as ‘an attack on the legal profession’

Attempts to prosecute lawyer Bernard Collaery are neither fair nor just, and undermine the value of Australia’s legal profession, according to the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

user iconEmma Musgrave 07 August 2019 The Bar
ACT Supreme Court
expand image

The former ACT attorney-general, as well as his client – a former spy known only as “Witness K” to the media – had criminal charges filed against them last year, which allege the pair conspired to reveal details of a covert operation to the public.

The charges are understood to relate to allegations that Australian government officials bugged the cabinet room of East Timor during the time the countries were holding sensitive negotiations pertaining to oil and gas.

Lawyers Weekly understands “Witness K is set to plead guilty to one count of conspiring to share information protected by Section 39 of the Intelligence Services Act, however Mr Collaery will fight the same charge, pleading not guilty.

Australian Lawyers Alliance (ALA) said the legal processes being employed to prosecute Mr Collaery are “not fair or just” as the details surrounding the charges filed against him have still not yet been fully disclosed, despite him having to appear in the ACT Supreme Court this week to front them.

“We are very disappointed that this prosecution is proceeding. It is very concerning to see Mr Collaery back in court facing charges that have still not been fully disclosed to him and being prevented from discussing the evidence with his own lawyers,” said Greg Barns, criminal justice spokesperson, ALA.

“A key element of a fair trial is the ability to have disclosure of the prosecution case so that defendants can respond to allegations against them and instruct their legal representatives appropriately.

“It would appear that national security laws are being used in this case to prevent Mr Collaery being able to fairly defend himself against the charges. This shroud of secrecy means there is no accountability.”

In a statement, ALA said it believes that the charges against Mr Collaery are “an attack on the legal profession and on Mr Collaery for acting as a lawyer within his professional rules”.

“Lawyers must be able to defend their clients in accordance with their professional standards without fear of state prosecution,” Mr Barns added, noting the prosecution is a breach of the UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers, adopted by the General Assembly in 1990.

The principles, Mr Barns explained, state that lawyers have the right to take part in public discussion of matters concerning the law, the administration of justice and the promotion and protection of human rights without suffering professional restrictions by reason of their lawful action.

“Many lawyers around Australia, acting in the best interests of their clients and justice, make available materials that may embarrass governments or expose wrongdoing. It is right and proper that they continue to do so when circumstances require,” he said.

“Lawyers play a vital role in ensuring that the right to freedom of speech is protected in our democracy. We give voice to the truth when it is inconvenient and that must continue to be our role.”

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated the charges against Mr Collaery and "Witness K" allege the pair bugged the East Timor cabinet room, rather than they are alleged to have disclosed the nature of the bugging that was allegedly carried out by Australian government officials.

emma.ryan@momentummedia.com.au

Emma Musgrave

Emma Musgrave

Emma Musgrave (née Ryan) is the managing editor, professional services at Momentum Media.

Emma has worked for Momentum Media since 2015, including five years spent as the editor of the company's legal brand - Lawyers Weekly. Throughout her time at Momentum, she has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest stories in corporate Australia. In addition, she has produced exclusive multimedia and event content related to the company's respective brands and audiences. 

Prior to joining Momentum Media, Emma worked in breakfast radio, delivering news to the Central West region of NSW, before taking on a radio journalist role at Southern Cross Austereo, based in Townsville, North Queensland.

She holds a Bachelor of Communications (Journalism) degree from Charles Sturt University. 

Email Emma on: Emma.Musgrave@momentummedia.com.au 

Comments (7)
  • Avatar
    According to the Privileges and Immunities (International Court of Justice) Regulations 1967, depending on how the ambiguous wording on exceptions regarding nationality is interpreted, advocates and witnesses and former advocates and witnesses have immunity from prosecution for their role in an ICJ matter. This reflects protections in the UN Statute on the International Court of Justice. In the case of Malaysian UN Rapporteur Cumaraswamy, the UN Secretary General won a case defending the Rapporteur’s right to speak on the issues he was investigating. In the decision it was stated that immunity is an issue to be determined in limine litis, ie. at the outset of a case. So far this hasn’t happened in the ACT Magistrate’s Court in the case against Mr Collaery.

    In the East Timor v Australia issue, the Permanent Court of Arbitration and the ICJ, despite being asked, have not so far acted publicly to enforce these basic protections for counsel and witnesses, which are fundamental to the proper operation of the law.
    0
  • Avatar
    Freedom of speech is not protected in Australia at all. Australia is not America, though I can see how some confusion could occur as the former is a client state of the latter.
    0
    • Avatar
      Well, speech is not explicitly protected - but it is protected in the sense that any speech which is not specifically criminalised is 'free'.
      0
  • Avatar
    Good lawyers in this country are treated on par with criminals. Even the latter know natural justice is not esoteric. It must be a practised minimum standard for all local, state and federal authorities - no matter the ignorance.
    1
  • Avatar
    Dr Terry Dwyer, Dwyer Lawyers Friday, 09 August 2019
    Where is the honour of the Crown in all this? Prosecutors around the country seem to have forgotten the basics. The Crown is meant to be the fountain of justice and they are polluting it.
    2
  • Avatar
    Is the second paragraph of this article factually correct?
    0
    • Avatar
      Hi Rob,
      Thank you for your comment. No, that was my mistake. I have amended the article and have issued a correction. Hopefully that correction will cross-over shortly but if not please see below:
      "An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated the charges against Mr Collaery and "Witness K" allege the pair bugged the East Timor cabinet room, rather than they are alleged to have disclosed the nature of the bugging that was alleging carried out by Australian government officials."
      My sincere apologies about the error on my part and for any inconvenience caused.
      Best regards,
      Emma Ryan, editor, Lawyers Weekly
      0
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!