Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

Professionals unite in support of marriage equality

The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come together to support same-sex marriage.

user iconTom Lodewyke 22 August 2017 The Bar
Unite
expand image

Law Society of NSW president Pauline Wright, NSW Bar Association president Arthur Moses SC and Australian Medical Association (NSW) president Professor Brad Frankum recently issued a joint statement in support of the legalisation of same-sex marriage at a federal level.

The hotly debated issue has brought together the principle of equality before the law and the mental health concerns associated with discrimination, according to the statement.

“Our organisations support the introduction of marriage equality laws and consider that legislation that discriminates on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity is fundamentally wrong,” the trio said.

Mr Moses noted the significance of the issue prompted the extraordinary joint statement from leaders in the legal and medical professions.

“This is an important issue. The rule of law requires that all Australians are treated equally,” Mr Moses said.

“Discrimination in the Marriage Act on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity is contrary to the rule of law.”

Ms Wright said denying same-sex couples the right to marry could contravene international law.

“The Law Society of NSW is committed to ensuring that all Australians are equal before the law in rights and dignity, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity,” Ms Wright said.

“Failing to recognise same-sex marriage can have a negative impact on the mental health and wellbeing of LGBTI people and their families, including those in the legal profession.

“It may also amount to discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation which is contrary to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which Australia is a signatory.”

Professor Frankum said the negative mental health impacts of discriminatory legislation make it a serious medical issue.

“I’m very happy to be joining the Law Society of NSW and NSW Bar Association to campaign jointly on this issue,” Professor Frankum said.

“We know that marriage laws, as they exist now, have adverse health consequences for gay, lesbian, transgender, bisexual and intersex people.

“Doctors have a duty to both treat and prevent illness, and for me, that also means rejecting discrimination in all its forms.”

The statement follows the launch of a marriage equality campaign by Marque Lawyers, supported by notable members of the profession, including Professor Gillian Triggs, Professor George Williams AO and Michelle Painter SC.

Three representatives of Maddocks recently appeared on The Lawyers Weekly Show to talk about the firm’s LGBTI diversity and inclusion initiatives ahead of Wear it Purple Day on 25 August.

Comments (19)
  • Avatar
    Pauline, any chance of you putting this: 'The Law Society of NSW is committed to ensuring that all Australians are equal before the law in rights and dignity' into a memo and circulating it to the various LS departments?
    2
  • Avatar
    I really wish Pauline Wright might actually do something useful, meaningful and to the benefit of the LSNSW members during her presidentship rather than just enjoy the financial perks and sing songs. How can she possibly speak for LSNSW members on this issue when she hasn't even asked them.
    3
  • Avatar
    I can't remember my professional body polling me for my view. How can they represent their Members when they don't know what the Membership believe?
    2
  • Avatar
    These people never really left high school. Heaven forbid they should stand up in the face of nonsense. That would go against the popular wave -- and standing alone is too frightening for them to bear. So for now, the emperor's new clothes remain exquisite.
    0
  • Avatar
    What a predictable load of crap from these smug virtue signalling pointless professional 'bodies'. How about advocating for their members (nb lawyer incomes have collapsed) rather than signing up for the latest trendy elite cause to make themselves look good?
    0
    • Avatar
      Ah yes, "virtue signalling", the refrain of those who believe that everyone is as selfish and lacking in empathy as they are.
      2
  • Avatar
    Since when did the rule of law require treatment of things which are not the same as if they were?
    0
  • Avatar
    I cannot register a boat as a car. They are different. That's discrimination, and rightly so.
    0
  • Avatar
    What about mental health concerns associated with persecuting those who hold traditional values and do not wish to support same sex wedding ceremonies?
    -1
    • Avatar
      If you think supporting same sex wedding ceremonies will give you mental health issues, then don't attend one. Problem solved!
      3
      • Avatar
        I wish my life was as easy as yours. It sounds peachy.
        -2
      • Avatar
        And if a minister of religion is forced to solemnize such a union? Problem not solved R.
        0
        • Avatar
          ... and what about bakers, florists, printers, venues , etc who do not wish to take part, on the basis of their moral or religious values? Overseas court cases show they are being prosecuted and persecuted for refusing to take part in same sex weddings. So much for freedom conscience, freedom of contract, freedom of religion, tolerance, inclusion, etc
          0
          • Avatar
            If the basis of anyone's objection to baking a cake for someone's wedding is religious intolerance, then I'm afraid it is rather hypocritical to call for tolerance of that. "Prosecuted and persecuted"? Cite your sources.
            -1
            • Avatar
              1. There is a difference between tolerating other people's views and being forced to actively participate in promoting them.
              2. Some American examples can be found at: www.wnd.com/2015/04/courts-conclude-faith-loses-to-gay-demands/
              1
            • Avatar
              You have an interesting definition of 'tolerance' bemused.


              tol¦er|ate.

              VERB

              1.allow the existence, occurrence, or practice of (something that one dislikes or disagrees with) without interference:

              "a regime unwilling to tolerate dissent"

              synonyms: allow · permit · authorize · sanction · condone · indulge ·
              [more]

              •accept or endure (someone or something unpleasant or disliked) with forbearance:

              "how was it that she could tolerate such noise?"

              synonyms: consume · take · stomach · digest · eat · receive ·
              [more]

              Tolerance doesn't mean participation. It certainly doesn't mandate forced participation.

              The left confuses tolerance with celebration.

              But hey, if the SJW's can rewrite the meaning of marriage, why can't they rewrite the meaning of 'tolerate'.

              0
            • Avatar
              Hmm yes, WND being a really reliable source (Wikipedia: "WND has drawn controversy for its promotion of conspiracy theories, including ones about Barack Obama's citizenship, and is considered to be a far right fringe website").
              0
            • Avatar
              What's wrong with social justi Friday, 25 August 2017
              Points lost, Anonymous, for using the term "SJW" in a serious discussion. I diagnose you as being (1) no more than 20 years old and (2) not a lawyer.
              0
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!