Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

Silks embody ‘excellence in learning and moral leadership’

Speaking last week at the annual Silks and Bows dinner, High Court Justice James Edelman said that the appointment to the rank of Senior Counsel or Queen’s Counsel was a recognition of a practitioner’s excellence that has its origins in Roman times.

user iconJerome Doraisamy 12 February 2019 The Bar
James Edelman
expand image

Addressing the annual dinner for incoming silks and members of the judiciary, hosted at the High Court of Australia, the Honourable Justice James Edelman said the awarding to a jurist of the ius respondendi – the right to speak with the authority of the law – through to the appointment of serjeants, starting under Edward I, still offer significant guidance in how the Australian legal profession recognises its own practitioners.

There are two core aspects of the recognition of legal excellence that remain today from those ancient and medieval bestowments respectively, he said: the impression that such practitioners are “a source of the law”, whose opinions carry considerable weight, and that they are embodied with moral and ethical leadership.

“Although the ‘cab rank’ rule came to be generally applicable to all barristers, the serjeants [under Edward I] were the leaders of the profession who set standards for moral and ethical duties,” he recounted.

When the title of Queen’s Counsel came into being, after Sir Francis Bacon deemed the serjeants to have “outlived their usefulness as a separate order, Justice Edelman continued, recognition of excellence was still inextricable.

“The rank of Queen’s Counsel or King’s Counsel remained, and remains, one that is concerned with excellence. It embodies excellence in learning and excellence in moral leadership.”

Two factors give rise to recognition by way of appointment to SC or QC, he noted: one is the public service of being a jurist, and the second is one’s judgment, that is, “knowing when to speak and when to keep quiet. Knowing what to concede and what to contest. Knowing the difference between what is right and what will advance your client’s case”, he explained.

And while the practice of law is the ultimate purpose for being for a silk, appointment to that rank is a necessary acknowledgement of the excellence of that practitioner, he surmised.

“The practice of law is, and will likely always be, a central focus in the appointment of silk, but the occasional and exceptional recognition of Queen’s Counsel [and Senior Counsel] from outside those who practice in law reinforces the fundamental bases for the appointment of silk that we celebrate: those fundamental bases are excellence in learning and excellence in moral leadership,” he concluded.

The toast, he therefore made, was to “the achievement of, and the aspiration for, excellence”.

The Australian Bar Association also congratulated the nation’s new silks, with ABA president Jennifer Batrouney QC saying: “the new silks [are] to be congratulated on their appointment, which acknowledges their outstanding service to the administration of justice through their skill, diligence, integrity, independence and standing in the profession.”

Jerome Doraisamy

Jerome Doraisamy

Jerome Doraisamy is the managing editor of Lawyers Weekly and HR Leader. He is also the author of The Wellness Doctrines book series, an admitted solicitor in New South Wales, and a board director of the Minds Count Foundation.

You can email Jerome at: jerome.doraisamy@momentummedia.com.au 

Comments (8)
  • Avatar
    Anonymous wrote:
    I guess you have to say something when asked to give a speech to a room full of new silks.

    Why not be noble and speak truth to power and tell the "room full of new silks" (misery) that the silk selection process has resulted in a title that no longer stands for anything other than how connected you are.
    1
  • Avatar
    I guess you have to say something when asked to give a speech to a room full of new silks.
    1
  • Avatar
    What he meant to say was that one has to give a lot of [insert] to be awarded this now meaningless designation.
    5
  • Avatar
    " moral leadership" ,get your hand off it as they said in the Castle. Some of the worst behaviour I have seen in the profession has been by Senior Counsel who then use the SC title like its some immunity pin on one of those silly TV shows.
    6
  • Avatar
    I thought AGs used to make themselves silks. There was a particular one who made himself silk, then nobody would brief him. Luckily, no that is the wrong word, he was made a Supreme Court judge by his political "friends". Previously in the middle ages the serjeants were the only ones who became judges, so this was the closed shop heritage we know and love. As His Honour said in Unions NSW, 'Freedom for the pike is death to the minnows."
    3
  • Avatar
    Is it still the case that you self-nominate for elevation to SC?
    I'd give the office more credence if it were by peer or peer-group nomination
    2
  • Avatar
    I'm not sure whether to vomit or laugh.
    8
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!