Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

Reconciling one’s creativity in the legal profession

Balancing the need to be creative with keeping it concise and “no-nonsense” in legal practice can be a hard lesson to learn, writes Leanne Cousinery.

user iconLeanne Cousinery 10 October 2022 SME Law
Reconciling one’s creativity in the legal profession
expand image

In 2021, I was admitted to the legal profession, and with this achievement, an increasingly clear realisation that being creative (in a traditionally “no-nonsense” profession) is a genuine and sure-fire challenge to my creative being.

It is a unique situation to be in, and like many other junior lawyers, I am learning to balance the two. Like the Lady of Justice herself, I find myself balancing my “creative” right-brained processes with my left-brained logical “lawyer” self.

Thinking back to my university days, numerous law lecturers preparing my cohort for law exams warned us: “Do NOT take us down the garden path or take a scattergun approach!” In all honesty, I have taken more than one or two law examiners down the garden path (Belated apologies to whoever marked my papers!) 

Advertisement
Advertisement

I am sure I unintentionally tortured my law teachers with “scattergun” prose instead of a “tight and concise” IRAC-structured answer. Not using IRAC in a law exam or assignment? What a cardinal sin!

Against the advice of these well-meaning university teachers, I often used and still use flowery language. I, therefore, find it seriously hard not to let this seep into my professional day-to-day tasks: either it be writing correspondence, speaking with colleagues and so on and so forth.

I often find myself wondering: “Am I coming off as ‘too much?’ or ’too excitable?’, ‘too animated?’, too this or too that?” and truthfully, it can result in a crisis of confidence.

Honestly, most times, I barely think in a linear or clear fashion, and so, I am deeply appreciative of the “different way of thinking” that law school has instilled within me. I have been challenged to think in a structured, logical way, learned to look at facts and evidence and view issues through an objective lens.

I can proudly say, studying law has provided me with a chance to balance my organically whimsical self with being a “pragmatic” lawyer. 

On another note, the silver lining to my creative self/logical self “conundrum” lies in social media. With platforms including LinkedIn, Instagram, and even TikTok (encouraging authenticity, diversity, and the celebration of “otherness” in the legal profession), I am cautiously optimistic that my inner need to be “flowery” can be equalised with my “no-nonsense”, IRAC-using lawyer self.

So here is to the lawyers, no matter how junior or senior, who are inherently creative and right-brained but continue to contribute to the now-evolving legal industry.

Leanne Cousinery is a graduate lawyer at Roam Migration Law.

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!