Login
Barrister lodges Supreme Court challenge against Daniel Andrews
On behalf of a Melbourne restaurateur, a barrister has lodged documents in the state’s Supreme Court arguing that the curfew decision is invalid and not proportionate.
Naomi Neilson
Premier Daniel Andrews and his government have been hit with another potential class action threat, this time on behalf of a Melbourne business owner who has argued that the recent curfew decision and extension of state of emergency powers are invalid and are not proportionate to the level of risk from the novel coronavirus crisis.
The documents claim that the curfew is not “reasonably proportionate” and the public health officials behind the lockdown decisions had failed to take into account a “social and psychological” impact of the measures on Victorian’s human rights.
Mr Andrews is already facing a multibillion-dollar class action suit from businesses that claim to have been affected by the COVID-19 lockdowns and are claiming that his part in the hotel quarantine system led to the “draconian” restrictions.
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan partner Damian Scattini is leading the first class action. He said that many businesses “need help now”: “As it stands, there is no plan for them. The class action provides a path to compensation for losses that are beyond their control and not brought about by them.”
Victorian Opposition Leader Michael O'Brien has welcomed this legal action, telling the media that the curfew decision was wrong and that there was no public health basis.
“It is a massive imposition on the basic rights of Victorians. The prospect that the Labor government acted unlawfully in imposing the curfew should send a chill down the spine of every Victorian,” Mr O'Brien said.
Naomi Neilson
Naomi Neilson is a senior journalist with a focus on court reporting for Lawyers Weekly.
You can email Naomi at:
