Nearly three in 10 firms now have fixed pricing
Twenty-nine per cent of law firms now report having fixed pricing structures for their clients but such approaches make it harder to ascertain how those firms are monitoring time, profitability, utilisation and performance, a new survey has found.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d157f/d157f486bc3dbeeb8d3b4ca8e873272ab73fa3d7" alt="Pitcher Partners"
‘The Pitcher Partners 2019 Legal Firm Survey’, conducted by national independent firms association Pitcher Partners, sought responses from 140 ‘mid-market firms’and found that for the nearly three in 10 firms that have fixed fees, it is difficult to track time, profitability, utilisation and performance of the legal practice for reason of not measuring time.
Whether firms not recording time – who also recorded the smallest revenue – were driven by philosophy or a lack of infrastructure was unclear, the report noted.
“Billing based on time keeps a focus on the cost drivers of work when estimating and quoting,” the report said.
“The 30-50 per cent of revenue not billed on time would indicate that firms still need to be responsive to client need with their available billing methods. If firms can flex to client needs, the bottom line appears to reflect the benefits.”
Only 25 per cent of firms reported tracking profitability, with those firms likely to be made up of those who are also using time-based billing. The reasons why firms were not – or could not – track profitability were not clear, however the report hypothesised that lack of software or the burdensome nature of such tasks could be factors.
“Regardless of the reason, having robust client acceptance and continuance policies and processes are essential,” the report said.
“If you want to improve your client mix, it will be almost impossible if time continues to be spent servicing unprofitable clients. However, you cannot manage the ongoing relationship and matter management of ‘unprofitable’ clients until you know who they are!”
The research showed that – outside of the 29 per cent who used fixed pricing and the 58 per cent who use time-based billing, 6 per cent of firms used value-based pricing and 7 per cent utilise “other” strategies.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15dcf/15dcfa90685f224de35236c75bf09c13028e123a" alt="Jerome Doraisamy"
Jerome Doraisamy
Jerome Doraisamy is the editor of Lawyers Weekly and HR Leader. He has worked at Momentum Media as a journalist on Lawyers Weekly since February 2018, and has served as editor since March 2022. In June 2024, he also assumed the editorship of HR Leader. Jerome is also the author of The Wellness Doctrines book series, an admitted solicitor in NSW, and a board director of the Minds Count Foundation.
You can email Jerome at: