How to... resolve litigation

Norton Rose Australia partner Grant Bonner offers insight into the recently settled but very complex Tcard litigation.

Grant Bonner • 20 March 2012 • SME Law

Norton Rose Australia partner Grant Bonner offers insight into the recently settled but very complex Tcard litigation.

You’re out of free articles for this month

Username or Email

Password Forgot password?

Keep me signed in on this device.

First Name

Last Name

Mobile

Organisation Type

By becoming a member, I agree to receive information and promotional messages from Lawyers Weekly. I can opt out of these communications at any time. For more information, please visit our Privacy Statement.

Need help signing up? Visit the Help Centre.

The recently settled Tcard litigation involved claims for public interest immunity, appeals to the Court of Appeal, use of the special counsel procedure, the discovery of over 1.2 million documents and the evidence of 46 lay witnesses. Moreover, the litigation was settled – averting the need for a 20-week trial in the Supreme Court – with the defendants paying only $5 million in damages after a $150 million suit was brought against them. Norton Rose Australia acted for the two defendants in the case.

Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.

Posting as

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail

Displayed next to your comments.

Comments will undergo moderation before they get published.

Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

SECTIONS

MORE

How to... resolve litigation

OUR PLATFORMS AND BRANDS

EVENTS AND SUMMITS

PODCASTS

LEARNING AND EDUCATION

MOMENTUM MARKETS NETWORK

LINKS

STAY CONNECTED