You have4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.

Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

Western law firms failing to break China

Australian law firms have a long way to go if they wish to succeed in China, writes Weidong Tian.

user iconDigital 04 December 2012 SME Law
Western law firms failing to break China
expand image

Australian law firms have a long way to go if they wish to succeed in China, writes Weidong Tian.

Over the last few months, I have been privileged to meet the partners of western law firms seeking to succeed in China, or with Chinese clients.

These partners I regard as part of a ‘first wave’ of law firm owners who are trying to find ways to better understand, as well as profit, from this massive but enigmatic market. In particular, it has been an honour to meet Australian lawyers, especially as the Australian Government starts a drive to better engage with China and Asia.

While I admire and respect the courage of these partners, I must admit that I haven’t been very impressed. While some firms are more sophisticated than others, almost all are committing errors in their strategic approach. What I find confusing is the reliance on untested assumptions about China and the Chinese, the lack of real curiosity about how to enhance their offering, as well as what I can best describe as mistrust, and at worst xenophobia, about my homeland.

Take the assumptions being made. One that exists in all firms is ‘because we employ Chinese lawyers in Australia, we understand China and we will succeed in China’. Let me make this clear – employing locally-educated PRC lawyers in Australia will not result in business success in China. Also, it is very difficult for them to provide constructive advice about where you might be making errors in your China strategy. In Chinese we have a saying: "He who is not in charge of governing does not interfere in its business".

Another similar assumption was ‘because we have offices in Hong Kong and on the mainland, we understand China’. This is mere window dressing as far as we Chinese are concerned. A mere physical presence does not bring us closer to Australian law firms. As a result, these firms are strangers to us, which we will exploit in hard negotiations by driving down the price.

The branding and projection of the right ‘face’ into China by law firms is particularly weak.

The research is clear – not one western law firm enjoys any effective brand awareness among Chinese corporates. Having the right cultural brand strength is a complex issue, but at a basic level I can’t think of one law firm that has a truly Chinese website.

Culture clash

The mistakes being made are, in some cases, disturbing. When we conduct cultural brand audits, most firms struggle to score even 50 per cent. There are still a considerable number of partners who have a very limited understanding of Chinese business culture, even though this is the key to relationships and success.

I mentioned before the strategic weaknesses of some firms. The simple fact is that there is a clear template for success for businesses that succeed in China. It is a complex issue, but the overall focus must be on making the service tangible and local to Chinese clients.

Happily, there are examples of western businesses that have succeeded in China. However, none of the law firms appear to be following the paths that have been set. What worries me is the lack of interest in learning from the experiences of others.

A DIY approach seems to be the norm. As a result, the strategies range from ones that are simply strange to those that are sophisticated but are not robust or resilient, therefore vulnerable to falling apart easily.

Perhaps these challenges can be partly explained by the very short-term approach that seems to dominate law firms’ strategic and financial management planning. This will never work in China.

It also seems to me that law firms find it very difficult to ask for advice, preferring to try and work things out on their own. This denial is difficult to understand. Once again, being determined and confident is to be applauded, but when arrogance starts to damage your business you have a major problem.

The Great Tiger can be tamed, but only for those who take risks and stop assuming things they don’t have any idea about. As we Chinese say: “How do you catch the tiger cub without entering the tiger's lair?”

Weidong Tian is a director of 6Dimensions, a consultancy advising Australian businesses seeking to succeed in China.

Tags
Comments (3)
  • Avatar
    <p>So, I guess the gist of this article is that the Australian legal industry should have your consultancy on a permanent retainer?</p><p>My initial snide comment aside, Weidong makes an excellent, cutting point. The commentary coming out of Australian law firms these days about the 'Asian Century' is laughable. Reading some of this stuff, anyone would think that Sydney- and Melbourne-based lawyers were single handedly responsible for leading Australia's push into Asia. They have not been and they are not. Sure their new UK/US masters have been out there in Asia putting in the hard yards with varying degrees of success, but they are efforts that pre-date the Australian legal industry's en masse capitulation to foreign Anglo conquerors.</p><p>How many Australian law firm partners speak an Asian language? How many Australian law firm partners have formally studied anything about the culture, art, religion, politics or economics of Asia? How many Australian law firm partners love being on the receiving end of a decent slab of Japanese, Korean and/or Chinese flame-grilled in-bound capital?</p><p>The answer to the first two questions: less than bugger all. The answer to the last question: shed loads - make mine medium-rare maaaate!</p><p>In Australia our collective knowledge and understanding of all things to do with Asia may not be in deficit to the same extent as our learned friends (read: owners) in the UK and the US. But the knowledge banks are still low on genuine Asia-related expertise. Such expertise cannot be crafted overnight. It is going to take many more years before we see the global law firm brands transcending borders with a consistent, meaningful and quality offering in each Asian jurisdiction.</p><p>The irony about the recent spate of AU + UK/US law firm merger activity is that in relation to Asia it may be a case of 1 + 1 still equals, well, just 1. The exception to this being King &amp; Wood Mallesons who appear to have got a jump start on everyone with respect to the real show in town</p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>A very insightful comment from one of the experts in the area. Thank you Weidong.</p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>Why so snide, Wiedong?</p>
    0
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!