Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

Large firms lacking balance

A noted legal academic has hit out at large law firms, claiming their culture is incompatible with notions of work-life balance.

user iconJustin Whealing 18 May 2012 SME Law
Large firms lacking balance
expand image

Australian National University (ANU) College of Law professor Margaret Thornton (pictured) was speaking to Lawyers Weekly after an online survey she developed to monitor the health and level of job satisfaction among lawyers went live this week.

She said the increased levels of competition within the private practice legal market due to the arrival of global law firms was at odds with rhetoric emanating from those firms about flexible work practices.

“I think the very notion of competition means there is much more attention to the idea of treating the client as king,” she said. “I don’t think they are going to change. It is just being realistic. One might even argue in one sense that it would be better to have two people do one job, and get less money, rather than continue with this notion that working day and night is the best way to go.”

Thornton received $146,000 from the Federal Government to undertake the survey. That has allowed her to employ an assistant to help develop the questions and analyse the data, and to also travel around Australia to interview lawyers before producing a final report at some stage next year.

She said she was motivated to undertake her study due to the paucity of data around whether the high rates of depression among lawyers is related to the practice of law.

In 2009, the Tristan Jepson Memorial Foundation and the University of Sydney Brain and Mind Research Institute released the Courting the Blues report for which over 2000 law students, solicitors and barristers were questioned. It revealed high levels of psychological distress among lawyers and law students.

“If a young lawyer goes into a firm and is very anxious about delivering something based on some notion of social justice, problems will emerge once they are given a very narrow ambit of work which is repetitive and quite boring,” she said. “There is a lack of satisfaction at this juncture between their training and their aspirations and what they are actually doing, with more and more specialisation at the big firms.”

Thornton is the latest prominent legal figure to question the culture of private practice law firms and the impact of the globalisation of Australia’s legal market.

Last month, NSW chief justice Tom Bathurst said the Australian legal market was being “colonised” by global firms. In September last year, Nigel McBride, the managing partner of Minter Ellison in South Australia and the Northern Territory, described the path to partnership as a “lottery”.

“You can come in, work hard for 10 or 15 years, never have a life and you may be one of the very few that get into an equity partner position,” he said.


Perception vs reality
Thornton said that an important recruitment weapon in the arsenal of large law firms was based on its location in major cities and sense of prestige. She said that such notions “seduce” recent graduates into joining large law firms.

“The big firms have always endeavored to seduce students or lure them into firms with very attractive offices; high-rise buildings in Sydney with harbour views and baristas to serve coffee and all of that,” she said. “I think this would be very appealing after one has been an impecunious student for quite a few years.

“This places even more pressure on the idea that the big firm is the acme of legal life.”

Thornton has been a legal academic for over 20 years, spending 16 years at La Trobe University prior to her appointment at ANU.

She has written many books and papers on issues of public policy, gender diversity and the law. She is also credited as the author of the only major work on Australian women in the legal sector, Dissonance and Distrust: Women and the Legal Profession, which was published in 1996.

The survey has 25 questions, covering topics such as salary, part-time work arrangements and balancing a career and family.

“I can’t see the numbers of women in senior positions improving in this present climate,” said Thornton. “It is no good producing the rhetoric and saying things should improve and having little studies and tweaking this and that.
“I don’t want to say that the outlook for the profession is gloomy, but it is with regard to issues such as diversity and attrition.”

You can access the survey here.

Comments (11)
  • Avatar
    <p>One (hyphenated) word people: in-house.</p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>One (hyphenated) word people: in-house</p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>I think law schools need to take some responsibility too and teach that:</p><p>1. You will not save the world<br>2. You cannot do whatever you like in terms of law<br>3. You will work long hours for poor pay<br>4. Every client wants to be number one</p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>Unfortunately, some people must engage in productive economic activity in order to generate the tax revenue that supports Margaret's frivolous research. </p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>JDC - I am interested to know what you are doing now? </p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>1. Not necessarily. Some clients are now insisting on work-life balance measures in order to ensure that their lawyers are working at peak performance.<br>2. Which particular market are you referring to? Firms servicing 'business'? Pretty broad.<br>3. Clients' expectations being exceeded and work life balance are not necessarily mutually exclusive concepts.  More pressure is being put on work life balance because of partner profits. This attitude, that one should not try to change things, is also myopic and dangerous. It is also typical of the attitudes at higher levels. Law firms are businesses - why not try to change work culture as other businesses do? There is a lot of potential there for change in order to attract top talent, and give clients better service.  <br>4. No. People should be able to work in the area of law they are interested in. I would never work in an area of law that didn't interest me, just because I could leave work earlier. Neither should people be expected to. This is particularly an issue for people who need flexible arrangements due to family obligations. We can try to ignore the needs of these people, but you are unnecessarily limiting the pool of potential talent.</p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>JDC - I am interested to know what you are doing now? </p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>An academic talking about work life balance... yawn.</p><p>The Commonwealth paid $146,000 for someone to 'discover' that people at large commercial firms work alot - what a breakthrough. A bargain at triple he price !</p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>A noted partner in a national law firm once told me during the course of a job interview that, their stated work/life balance policy, wasn't worth the paper it was written on, and that, he often worked 6 or 7 days a week, and he would often SLEEP in his office. Suffice to say, I did not pursue a role with that firm! No job, no matter how well paid is worth that level of commitment, and personal sacrifice. Yes, I have worked crazy hours before, but will not again. It's just not worth it, and that level of commitment is not sustainable in the long-term. Something always gives - whether relationships, health, or both. It's no surprise then that, lawyers as a profession suffer the highest depression rate - 25% - of any profession. Yes, folks, we have overtaken dentists in the depression stakes. It's time for lawyers to WAKE UP from their deep sleep and re-assess their priorities. I know I have.  </p>
    0
  • Avatar
    Danny Farrugia Friday, 18 May 2012
    <p>Large national and international law firms exist to provide services to business.</p><p>If a lawyer seeks work life balance:</p><p>1. Understand that the market and the clients are not going to change in terms of their demands and expectations which are continuing to progressively increase;</p><p>2. Do not seek work in a law firm which services this market;</p><p>3. Seeking to change these firms is a waste of time - their aim must be to exceed their clients's expectations;</p><p>4. Do not choose a career in business law at this level - chose another level of legal practice or area of legal practice or career which allows the flexibility you seek <br> </p>
    0
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!