Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

Catholic Church not ‘above the secular law’

Survivors of child sexual abuse deserve better than the continued suggestion that the Catholic Church in Australia does not have to comply with the laws of the land, says an advocacy group.

user iconJerome Doraisamy 15 August 2019 Politics
Dr Pam Stavropoulos

Source: linkedin.com/company/blue-knot-foundation/?originalSubdomain=jm

expand image

The Blue Knot Foundation, which offers trauma and resilience support to the millions of Australians with lived experience of abuse, has said it is “unfortunate” that suggestions the Catholic Church is above the law continue.

“Whatever justification Church authorities present to support this stance, the continued suggestion that the Catholic Church is above the secular law of the society in which it operates is unfortunate to say the least,” said Blue Knot Foundation head of research Dr Pam Stavropoulos in a statement.

“Survivors of the widespread clergy abuse which is substantiated unequivocally by the recent royal commission, Catholic parishioners, and society at large will draw their own conclusions on this.”

In conversation with Lawyers Weekly, Blue Knot Foundation spokesperson Tarja Malone said it is “absolutely fundamental” that adults take responsibility to protect children from harm.

“Complex childhood trauma impacts survivors’ lives on a significant and detrimental way with flow-on impacts on families, communities and societies on the whole. Protecting children from harm should be a priority of all adults and in particular any adults who have a position of power in the community,” she explained.

“Clergy need to adapt to modern child protection ideologies and place the care and protection of children at the forefront of their connection with the community.”

When asked if the Church’s attitude undermines the rule of law, she said adults who have responsibilities in caring for children are required by law to report offences.

“A refusal to adapt to current community values around child protection will undoubtedly mean that survivors and their families cannot be assured that religious organisations place the safety and care of children at the forefront of their operations and ethics.”

The comments come in response to reports that the Catholic Church is set to defy legislation aimed at “forcing priests to break the seal of confession to report child abuse”.

Earlier this year, a “legal roadblock” was removed in NSW, which had prevented thousands of survivors of child sexual abuse from suing churches and other institutions.

At the time, NSW Attorney-General Mark Speakman said: “A child abuse survivor will [now] be able to sue an unincorporated organisation, which can nominate a proper defendant with sufficient assets to meet the claim. If it fails to do so, the court can appoint associated trustees to be sued who can access trust property to pay the compensation.”

“This means all survivors of institutional child abuse in NSW will now have the same access to compensation through civil litigation, no matter what kind of organisation is responsible,” he said.

Jerome Doraisamy

Jerome Doraisamy

Jerome Doraisamy is the managing editor of Lawyers Weekly and HR Leader. He is also the author of The Wellness Doctrines book series, an admitted solicitor in New South Wales, and a board director of the Minds Count Foundation.

You can email Jerome at: jerome.doraisamy@momentummedia.com.au 

Comments (8)
  • Avatar
    Let's be kind and say only that one of the largest groups of paedophiles comes from the Catholic Church. Why would anyone consider providing that group [or any other group]
    with a privileged defence to reporting sexual abuse?
    1
  • Avatar
    Bemused wrote:
    Agreed, David, It is depressing, though sadly hardly surprising, that there should still be people who jump to the defence of the Catholic Church on this issue. I wonder whether these are the same people who so vehemently oppose any change to abortion law? In which case, what's really being argued here is that human life is valuable until a child is born, after which, if you are unfortunate enough to be abused by someone who then confessed to a priest, you're on your own.
    0
  • Avatar
    The Pope is above the laws of man. He only answers to God's law.
    -2
  • Avatar
    Millions? Is this person just another lawyer who can’t deal with figures or statistics? Where does the figure come from? There aren’t millions of priests!
    -1
  • Avatar
    the continued suggestion that the Catholic Church is above the secular law
    I haven't heard ANY suggestion that the Catholic Church is above the law.
    I have heard that there should be an exclusion in the law. I have heard that some priests will not comply with the law. I have even heard that structures have been used to skirt the law (hardly unique to the Catholic Church). But I haven't heard once that the Church is above the law.
    Of course, the truth isn't as convenient for the narrative.
    -5
  • Avatar
    The responses that are given here to the Catholics Church's approach to the seal of confession show a simplistic understanding of the sacrament. In any case, the church does not say it is above the law, they just says it won't break their vows. Just like lawyers, if priests start breaking the confidence of the confessional, the confessors won't tell them anything. That reduces the ability of the priest to counsel the confessor away from their action, and hopefully to the police. No one wins. More thought is needed on this issue.
    -3
    • Avatar
      The Catholic church has repeatadly stated that they will ignore / defy any mandatory reporting laws, and that the Seal of the Confessional is unbreakable. If that's not setting yourself "above the law" I don't know what is. The reporting is therefore accurate.
      Secondly, lawyers can and in fact are obligated to breach confidentiality in circumstances where not doing so would place another in immediate risk of harm. Why shouldn't priests do the same?
      5
      • Avatar
        Agreed, David, It is depressing, though sadly hardly surprising, that there should still be people who jump to the defence of the Catholic Church on this issue. I wonder whether these are the same people who so vehemently oppose any change to abortion law? In which case, what's really being argued here is that human life is valuable until a child is born, after which, if you are unfortunate enough to be abused by someone who then confessed to a priest, you're on your own.
        5
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!