Integrity Commission must ‘bring out the best’ in Australia’s democracy
If Australia’s anti-corruption watchdog is to be strong and effective, it will need $100 million per year to properly clamp down and ensure political integrity, according to Transparency International Australia.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdfcc/bdfcc8ccf6675e93029d7daab4095bc73307480d" alt="Serena Lillywhite"
Non-partisan advocacy organisation Transparency International Australia – which is chaired by barrister and Labor candidate for the federal seat of Higgins Fiona McLeod SC – has released its draft recommendations from Australia’s second National Integrity System Assessment, which considers how to strengthen accountability and integrity of government.
“The question is no longer ‘will we have an anti-corruption watchdog’, it is ‘how can we have the best one for our democracy’ and what else is needed beyond simply that one reform? In this draft report we present the architecture of a new system – one that goes beyond punishing corruption and fosters the highest level of integrity across our government and parliament.”
TI Australia board member and Professor of public policy and law at Griffith University AJ Brown said the recommendations from the organisation were features that are missing from proposals for the National Integrity Commission – including the government’s own proposal.
“Major recommendations focus on the national integrity commission – why it must have a broad, truly national focus, why it must not be limited to just criminal corruption, why it needs strong and clearer public hearing powers, and why there must be a strong framework of mandatory real-time reporting of corruption issues,” he said.
“We estimate that Australia needs to spend $100 million a year for a strong, effective and well-coordinated system that clamps down on corruption and promotes political integrity across all government functions.”
“While the Coalition Government has promised 30 per cent more resources to its proposed Commonwealth Integrity Commission than the Australian Labor Party, neither party has committed adequate funds, and neither party has a monopoly on how to get this right,” he continued.
With public trust in politicians at an all-time low, and overwhelming frustration at the lack of political integrity and corruption, Professor Brown added that all parties must to respond to TI Australia’s proposals and “show their commitment to a strong national framework for democratic reform”.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15dcf/15dcfa90685f224de35236c75bf09c13028e123a" alt="Jerome Doraisamy"
Jerome Doraisamy
Jerome Doraisamy is the editor of Lawyers Weekly and HR Leader. He has worked at Momentum Media as a journalist on Lawyers Weekly since February 2018, and has served as editor since March 2022. In June 2024, he also assumed the editorship of HR Leader. Jerome is also the author of The Wellness Doctrines book series, an admitted solicitor in NSW, and a board director of the Minds Count Foundation.
You can email Jerome at: