Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

Is Kathleen Folbigg innocent? New evidence suggests she is

Kathleen Folbigg has been branded Australia’s worst female serial killer but new research into the deaths of her four children, backed by the world’s leading experts, may instead make her Australia’s worst miscarriage of justice.

user iconRobyn Tongol 17 September 2021 Podcast
Is Kathleen Folbigg innocent? New evidence suggests she is
expand image

On this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, host Naomi Neilson is joined by solicitor Rhanee Rego to discuss the new scientific evidence that suggests Ms Folbigg has spent the past 18 years behind bars for crimes she never committed.

Backed by genomic testing, a group of eminent scientists have cast doubt on Ms Folbigg’s guilt and her 2003 conviction for the manslaughter of her son Caleb and the murders of her three other children, Patrick, Sarah and Laura. With a new petition, Ms Rego and others on Ms Folbigg’s legal team hope to see her free.

During this episode, Ms Rego shares the legal avenues still available to Ms Folbigg (whether a pardon is granted or not), explains how the controversial diary entries play into this new research, and discusses what Ms Folbigg’s potential wrongful conviction could mean for the justice system – including what should and shouldn’t be accepted as credible and reliable forensic evidence and research.

“This case should be of concern to everyone because it establishes that hard scientific facts can be pushed aside in preference of subjective interpretations of circumstantial evidence. That is scary and, frankly, one that every lawyer, every person, should be concerned about. It’s not just about Ms Folbigg,” Ms Rego said.

Ms Rego also examines how media and public perception play into a case like Ms Folbigg’s, the opportunities that wrongful convictions offer the legal system, how she herself got involved in Ms Folbigg’s matter, and much more.

Have a listen now!

Additional notes: What is the new scientific research? 

The crux of the petition is based on the full genomic sequencing of Ms Folbigg and all four of her children. It found that Ms Folbigg had a previously unreported mutation to the CALM2 gene designated G114R. The CALM2 gene controls how calcium is transported in and out of heart cells and studies have found variations can cause heart problems in young children. This was found in both Sarah and Laura. 

Caleb and Patrick’s genomes showed a separate rare genetic variant in the BSN gene, with studies in mice linking it to early lethal epileptic fits. Patrick was diagnosed with epilepsy before his death and Caleb had a floppy larynx.

Have a question?

If you have any questions about this episode and Ms Folbigg’s case, send us an email at editor@lawyersweekly.com.au for any future episodes or other content.

If you like this episode, show your support by rating us or leaving a review on Apple Podcasts (The Lawyers Weekly Show) and by following Lawyers Weekly on social media: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and our new Instagram.  

If you have any other topics in mind or if you would like to lend your voice to the show, email editor@lawyersweekly.com.au for more insights! 

Plus, in case you missed them, check out our most recent episodes: 

 

Comments (4)
  • Avatar
    I cannot believe the review did not result in her release. The further information clearly suggests she should never have been convicted, as there uscetsinly reasonable doubt about her guilt now.
    0
  • Avatar
    Please sign the public petition to release Kath
    www.change.org/p/mark-speakman-attorney-...kathleen-folbigg-now
    0
  • Avatar
    This is a shocking miscarriage of justice. No reasonable person considering the evidence objectively can properly conclude that Ms Folbigg's guilt remains established beyond reasonable doubt. Ergo, she must be released using the most expeditious mechanism available. Similarly to the miscarriage of justice in the conviction of Timothy Anderson for the Hilton Hotel bombing, Mark Tedeski SC as prosecutor in this matter overstated the prosecution's case.
    0
  • Avatar
    Dr Robert N Moles - Networked Saturday, 18 September 2021
    This is an excellent overview of a complex case and clearly illustrates the need for the establishment of a Criminal Cases Review Commission in Australia - and the need to review the way in which the courts deal with expert scientific evidence.
    1
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!