You have4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.

Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

Legal bodies shame govt over children in detention report

user iconFelicity Nelson 13 February 2015 SME Law
Gillian Triggs

Lawyers have spoken out against the mandatory detention of children following the release of a “deeply shocking” report by the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC).

Lawyers have spoken out against the mandatory detention of children following the release of a “deeply shocking” report by the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC).

Claire Hammerton, spokesperson for Australian Lawyers for Human Rights, said the report revealed that the Australian government was engaged in “systematic child abuse”.

“There is no reasonable justification for the policy of keeping children in immigration detention,” she said.

The Human Rights Law Centre’s director of legal advocacy, Daniel Webb, called Australia’s treatment of asylum seeker children “one of the most punitive policy approaches in the world”.

“It’s harmful. It’s a breach of international law. It must end,” he said.

The Australian Bar Association (ABA) has called on the government to accept the report’s recommendations and release children and their families from immigration detention in Australia and Nauru.

ABA president Fiona McLeod SC said the harm to children in detention is “a matter of grave concern” and puts Australia in breach of its international obligations under the Convention on the Rights of the Child.

Ms McLeod insisted that the government amend the Migration Act to strictly limit the period of time children and their families can be detained for the purposes of health, identity and security checks.

“We have independent, verifiable, categorically clear evidence provided by doctors and other trained medical professionals that children in detention are suffering horrendously,” said Australian Lawyers Alliance spokesperson Greg Barns.

Mr Barns said it was unacceptable to have a single child in detention and criticised the government for being in possession of the report since November without taking remedial action.

“In those few months, children have endured suffering that they need not have endured.”

The AHRC report, The Forgotten Children, is the product of a year-long national inquiry to investigate the impact of prolonged detention on the health, wellbeing and development of children.

The report “gives a voice” to the hundreds of children still in detention by integrating findings from five public hearings, 239 submissions and over one thousand interviews with children and parents.

It presents evidence from scholarly research and Department of Immigration and Border Protection data as well as the views of medical experts and the Australian community.

The AHRC found that there were 128 incidents of self-harm amongst children in detention over a 15-month period during 2013 and 2014.

It showed that 34 per cent of child detainees suffer from severe mental health disorders and require psychiatric support, compared to two per cent of children in the general community.

The report also revealed that children in detention were exposed to unacceptable levels of assault, including sexual assault and violence.

“Never again should any child be treated in this way in Australia’s name,” said AHRC president Professor Gillian Triggs (pictured).

Professor Triggs recently came under fire for recommending that a Papuan refugee be released from immigration detention.

Prime Minister Tony Abbott said Professor Triggs demonstrated “extremely questionable judgement”, but human rights groups have since said his criticisms were politically motivated and inappropriate.

Comments (41)
  • Avatar
    <p>Ian, I only asked you if you could please explain what you meant when you referred to pools and yoga and detained kids. I didn't understand the point you were making.</p><p>I don't think I mounted any argument there. I just tendered my interpretation of your point. But maybe my interpretation was wrong?</p><p>If you could please enlighten me Ian, I would be most grateful.</p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>Obviously Godwin's law applies, and your consequently your argument can't be taken seriously. Nor I note do you answer my questions. If we can't rely on Gillian Trigg's " evidence to a Senate Committee, why should we believe her report?" and "how many deaths would you be prepared to tolerate by reintroducing the same pull factors implementing the HR commission's recommendations?" I have to assume you have no answers.</p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>Ian, I don't really understand what you are trying to insinuate: that the kids in detention are okay because they have access to a pool and yoga?</p><p>C'mon mate, this is a pretty tenuous argument...</p><p>The Germans said similar things about the concentration camps in the 1940's.</p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>By causes, are you talking about poverty, war? I assume, then, you'd disapprove of the Government's abandonment of foreign aid.</p><p>I have a problem with your assumption that we have uniform "standards and beliefs". That is clearly wrong. If you want proof, read the diverse opinions expressed here.</p><p>I think that there should be some common beliefs. One of them is accepting others' differences. But given what you have said, I'm not sure you share in this belief.</p><p>I don't know whether - but very much doubt that - refugees choose to risk everything in an attempt to come to Australia if their beliefs are so dogmatically set against living in a secular, pluralist society. Rather, I should think that the vast majority of refugees would see Australia as a great opportunity to escape oppression and persecution.</p><p>Perhaps there is a minority hell-bent on not "fitting in", but, then again, that minority already exists here - and they have Australian birth certificates.</p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>If you're not missing the point then you are being deliberately obtuse.<br>You simply can't dismiss the timing of the report because it doesn't suit your narrative.</p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>The report was commissioned when Triggs preferred government lost office.<br>Simple.</p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>Oh - How many have you spoken to? What evidence of this have you seen? Believe me simply wanting a better standard of living is no where near enough to make people very literally risk life and limb to leave to somewhere. You have to extraordinarily desperate to put yourself through this and even more desperate to put your children through this. After you have spent a few months working with and talking to these people, come back, look me in the eye and tell me they are economic refugees! Shame on you for being so judgemental, with so little knowledge of what you are talking about!</p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>Jenny, it turns out that on Christmas Island under the current government children have a fenced pool and access to swimming lessons, schooling, Tai Chi/Yoga, they participate in community sporting events, have a band, disco, movie nights, picnics and many other activities, all supervised. Many are still in detention because their parents chose to keep the family intact (as is their right). You say "don't shoot the messenger", but Gillian Triggs has done that to herself with her "memory lapses" with respect to armed guards and consultations with Labor Ministers. Her explanation on the timing of her inquiry has now changed at least four times. If we can't rely on her evidence to a Senate Committee, why should we believe her report?</p><p>Moreover the 2008 to 2013 experience showed us that dismantling the Pacific Solution resulted in over 1200 deaths at sea. That's a rate of over 200 per year, many of them children. How many deaths would you be prepared to tolerate by reintroducing the same pull factors implementing the HR commission's recommendations?</p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>These are economic refugees not genuine refugees.</p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>Triggs has politicised the AHRC and must resign. Once again we have legal bodies in Australia totally out of step with the vast majority of Australian voters. These bodies should survey their members and see what are their views on ILBOAs.</p>
    0
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!