You have3 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 3 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.

Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

Lawyers compelled to see eye-to-eye with other colleagues

Law firms have been urged to reflect on how ‘non-fee-earners’ are perceived in the workplace, starting with the use of the term.

user iconMelissa Coade 27 June 2016 NewLaw
Lawyers compelled to see eye-to-eye with other colleagues
expand image

With self-improvement a constant priority for law firms looking to stay head and shoulders above the rest, Barolsky Advisers strategy consultant Joel Barolsky believes the time for lawyers to confront “professional arrogance” has come.

In an interview with Lawyers Weekly, Mr Barolsky said that dialogues concerning culture-shift in law firms must turn to the ‘fee-earner’ versus ‘fee-burner’ mentality. Although the common catchphrase is used as shorthand and often in jest, its essence drives a greater wedge between lawyers and other members of the firm’s workforce.

“There are those in direct fee-earning roles who have this idea that there are staff who earn the profit or burn the profit in firms,” Mr Barolsky said.

“At the most basic level, the symbolism around that idea might not be overt and there may be a slight undercurrent of humour, but there is a judgement that goes with it.

“It is a view where function areas are pigeon-holed. So there’s a lack of an understanding of the full breadth and depth of those disciplines,” he said.  

Among those non-lawyers whose talent goes unnoticed are HR, marketing, IT, finance and secretarial support staff, Mr Barolsky suggested. The cost of this attitude, overt or otherwise, reaches beyond the bottom line of a business.

“The question of whether you are an earner or a burner reflects a mindset which takes a simplistic view of the value of people in business service roles or support service roles,” he explained.

“The biggest risk is that law firms just won’t be able to attract top talent. Top talent will go to competitors and ultimately the firm will be weaker by virtue of that phenomenon.”

Similar to the unconscious bias that fogs decisions about the meritorious and equal advancement of women, for example, Mr Barolsky urged law firms’ diversity agendas to tackle what he describes as “professional arrogance”.

“Sometimes it’s quite a deep-seated prejudice and it’s very hard to overcome, as in any prejudice.

“How the issue is dealt with is often a function of the knowledge and sophistication of the firm’s managing partner and how they see the world,” he said.

“If you think about the work that’s being done in law firms around diversity and unconscious bias, many take the position that they need to be more aware of unconscious bias. My view is that [this] can also extend to diversity of roles and diversity of skills, and embracing the talent of other shared services in a much more open way.”

Comments (4)
  • Avatar
    <p>Hi Michael<br>I have two open questions for yourself and for whomever wants to jump on board.</p><p>Q1. Are we saying "Professional arrogance"? or Lawyers arrogance?<br>Two completely different I say. <br>Q2. (My hypothesis is this): Not all Lawyers are professional Lawyers. <br>Any views on that?<br>I find your contributed discussion very interesting and look forward to reading more.</p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>My legal assistant (secretary) was my left hand, we worked together as a team &amp; she helped me do my job well, many lawyers are simply snobs: they are wealthy &amp; attended large private schools, their employees did not, </p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>The term 'fee earner' was invented in the 1980s by non-lawyer staff at law firms, to demean qualified professionals as though their only function was to earn money for the firm. These same non legally qualified law firm staff can now hardly complain if they are classified as 'fee burners' or 'fee spenders', since it was they who invented and highlighted the distinction. The fact is that it is the qualified professional lawyers (i.e., the 'fee earners') who do what the law firm does (i.e. provide legal advice and assistance to the firm's clients). All other staff are overheads. Their role is to support the legal staff and enable them to service the firm's clients as well and efficiently as possible. If they are not doing this then they should not be there. This is not professional arrogance, but merely a recognition of the truth. Hopefully for the future of the law firm and its clients, the support staff will do their jobs well enough to justify their salaries, which are paid out of the fees earned by the productive professional staff of the law firm.</p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>How about cost centre instead? </p>
    0
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!