You have2 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 2 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.

Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

Restrict police cooperation in death penalty cases: LCA, ABA

Legal professional groups have urged the government to restrict Australia’s involvement in transnational crime investigations that could end in executions.

user iconFelicity Nelson 30 October 2015 NewLaw
death penalty
expand image

The Law Council of Australia and the Australian Bar Association have called for reform to the Australian Federal Police Act 1979 (Cth) to prevent authorities from providing information to foreign countries in cases that could lead to a person facing the death penalty.

In a submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade this month, the legal bodies said current practice was inconsistent with Australia’s “absolute opposition” to capital punishment.

“The death penalty is cruel and inhuman, and has not been shown to deter crime,” the submission states.

“Legislative reform would relieve the Australian Federal Police of the burden of making such complex decisions in life and death matters.”

According to the submission, the majority of the 1,847 names provided by the AFP to foreign police between 2009-14 were being investigated for drug offences in countries with the death penalty.

However, between three and 15 requests for assistance in cases involving the death penalty were denied by the AFP. This indicates that the AFP is already exercising discretion, while still approving the “vast majority” of these cases, according to the submission.

“The issue is then whether this is an appropriate outcome in light of Australia’s opposition to the death penalty,” the submission reads.

Under the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) a person cannot be extradited to face the death penalty.

In the submission, the legal bodies argue that there is no real distinction between sending a person to face the death penalty directly and helping with an investigation that may lead to that outcome.

The ABA and LCA’s submission also promotes government strategies for persuading other countries to abolish capital punishment, arguing that Australia is “well placed to be a leading state actor” in the Asia-Pacific region.

While Australia ditched the death penalty for good in 1967, nine countries carried out executions every year between 2009-13, including Bangladesh, China, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, the US and Yemen. China alone executed more than 1,000 people in 2014.

However, more than four out of five countries are either abolishing the death penalty or not practising it.


Comments (1)
  • Avatar
    <p>Yes, Australia ditched the death penalty for good in 1967, AFTER the state of Victoria hanged a wrongly convicted man, Ronald Ryan. For the record, there was/is NO scientific ballistic forensic evidence to prove Ryan guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Ryan's rifle was never tested by forensics to prove it had fired a shot. This is fact !!!</p><p>Ryan was convicted solely on unrecorded unsigned unproven allegations of verbal confessions. There were ambiguities in the capital case, alleged missing pieces of vital evidence, dire inconsistencies of all fourteen eyewitnesses for the prosecution, and the fact that hundreds of people heard one single shot - fired and admitted and testified by a prison guard. If Ryan had also fired a shot at least one person would have heard two shots - nobody heard two shots. The autopsy report, verified by a ballistic expert, indicated the single fatal shot was fired from a distance, at an elevated position, in a downward trajectory angle ... impossible for Ryan to have fired at such.</p><p>In addition, a few months after the 12-man jury convicted Ryan, seven jurors strongly campaigned against the hanging, they told the Media that they would never have convicted Ryan had they known he would be hanged. Bizarre ???</p><p>Read the facts ... <a href="www.ronaldryan.info" rel="nofollow">www.ronaldryan.info</a></p>
    0
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!