Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

ABA criticises ‘dangerously broad’ new citizenship bill

The federal government’s final draft of its controversial citizenship legislation could unfairly extend to innocent Australians on humanitarian missions, the Australian Bar Association warns.

user iconStefanie Garber 30 June 2015 NewLaw
Fiona Mcleod ABA
expand image

The government last week introduced the Australian Citizenship Amendment (Allegiance to Australia) Bill, which would allow dual citizens to be stripped of citizenship where they “act inconsistently with their allegiance to Australia”.

ABA president Fiona McLeod said the Bill was an improvement on previous proposals, but she remained “deeply troubled” at its scope.

“The new provisions expand significantly the circumstances in which citizenship is to be revoked,” Ms McLeod said. “Unwieldy provisions that will reach well beyond their intended purpose have replaced the former requirements of a criminal conviction for terrorism-related conduct.”

She warned that the legislation could be applied to people who had been acquitted, had committed only minor offences or who worked with terrorist organisations inadvertently or against their will.

“People who remain loyal to Australia, who are not a threat or have done no harm, such as those who work with humanitarian organisations providing food or medical aid in war-torn parts of the world, can be caught up and lose their Australian citizenship,” Ms McLeod said.

She also suggested the executive would be given excessive power, while court oversight was curtailed.

“The responsibility will fall upon public servants to determine, based on untested and undisclosed information, that certain trigger events have occurred and a person has, by their conduct, been forever stripped of citizenship,” she said.

“The Minister remains vested with an extraordinary power to give practical effect to the revocation and may act unilaterally, without regard to evidence of disloyalty or adverse security threat.”

As an alternative, she encouraged the government to provide for merits review by the courts of any citizenship decisions under the new provisions.

“Laws introduced in the name of security that erode some of our dearest freedoms and exclude judicial scrutiny must be carefully analysed, without undue haste, and the consequences of them clearly explained to all of us. Once done, they cannot easily be undone.”

Comments (6)
  • Avatar
    <p>Apparently now it includes Doctors trying to fulfill their hippocratic oath. The slippery slope is becoming a cliff.</p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>Wow. Being naive must be contagious. What we have here is a law that throws the entire legal system out the window. One of the primary reasons we have a legal system is to protect us from the state and your response is "why don't we just trust the Government" Asinine.</p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>“act inconsistently with their allegiance to Australia" - could this also include, perhaps, an Australian dual national serving in the armed forces of another country - such as Israel for example? Or voting in a foreign election that returns a government the then current Australian Government does not like? Barraking for the Poms at the cricket? We are asked to trust politicians more than judges, when all evidence, experience and opinion polls indicate the opposite.</p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>experience...</p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>Are you serious?</p>
    0
  • Avatar
    <p>I do not see the problem. Why don't you just trust the government/public servants to do the right thing like everyone else.</p>
    0
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!