You have4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.

Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

The ‘legal backlash’ following the Me Too movement

In a recent keynote speech, human rights lawyer Jennifer Robinson explored the “decline” in gender inequality and the problem with defamation claims stemming from the Me Too movement.

user iconLauren Croft 22 October 2024 Big Law
expand image

Human rights barrister and author Jennifer Robinson has represented Julian Assange, Richard Dawkins, and Amber Heard, and co-authored her book How Many More Women? Exposing How the Law Silences Women, which explores the legal response to the Me Too movement.

In a recent keynote speech at the 2024 Australian Women Lawyers National Conference, Robinson spoke about free speech and gender-based violence, as well as the global crisis of women being silenced.

“Violence against women is actually increasing in this country. Earlier this year, one woman every four days was being killed. A global study just this month, not just in Australia, showed that of the 139 countries that they looked at, nearly 40 per cent had stagnated or declined when it comes to gender equality. The only country that was listed as very good was Switzerland, and I can tell you, my girlfriends in Switzerland will tell you they would take issue with that rating,” she said.

“But the current trajectory means that gender inequality will be worse in 2030 than it was when the Sustainable Development Goals were set in 2015. So we are seeing a massive kickback and decline, and why is that?”

When the Me Too movement happened in 2017, Robinson described it as a “breaking of the cultural silence” – yet it still had consequences for women.

“Women were speaking out for the first time about their experience of gender-based violence. But what I’m seeing in my practice in London, and I work with media organisations, I defend journalists, I advise women who speak out, there was this legal backlash that was happening. The New York Times has reported this huge number of defamation claims being filed against journalists and against women for reporting these stories,” she said.

“I would be working with journalists trying to break these Me Too stories before the Me Too movement, and I can’t tell you how many of the stories were what we call spiked because they would say things like: ‘Well, it’s only one woman accusing him, we need more than one woman coming forward; otherwise, we can’t report this.’ And I remember having fights with editors saying, in a criminal justice context, her testimony is enough to send a man to prison, why do we need more than one woman to accuse him to report the truth about what he did?

“But suddenly with Me Too, everybody felt more comfortable with that, and you had the press rushing out all these stories, Harvey Weinstein and the like, but what we were seeing was that there was this perception that you could report this stuff and you could speak out online without consequence. But what we were seeing was so many women coming into our office for having posted on social media and being threatened with a suit.”

However, the Me Too movement was followed by a “raft of defamation claims”, according to Robinson – something she said she was concerned about moving forward.

“Geoffrey Rush, Craig McLachlan, Don Burke, [and] more recently, Bruce Lehrmann. But there was this big discussion about whether it was stemming the Me Too movement in Australia. And I think there’s a really good argument to say it was. Of course, it might be an oversimplification. But there’s some great research that’s being done, about how defamation claims were used to stifle the civil rights movement,” she said.

“That’s what I’m concerned about. It’s not just about these individual cases; it’s what it’s doing to the broader political context in which we live and the space for women to speak out. I am concerned that if we don’t deal with the existing legal system or law reform to change it, we are stifling women from coming forward and the broader movement for equality and to end violence against women in this country.”

Lauren Croft

Lauren Croft

Lauren is a journalist at Lawyers Weekly and graduated with a Bachelor of Journalism from Macleay College. Prior to joining Lawyers Weekly, she worked as a trade journalist for media and travel industry publications and Travel Weekly. Originally born in England, Lauren enjoys trying new bars and restaurants, attending music festivals and travelling. She is also a keen snowboarder and pre-pandemic, spent a season living in a French ski resort.

Comments (1)
  • Avatar
    garth.campbell@********.com.au Tuesday, 22 October 2024
    I understand the political point being made, but speaking as an individual, defamation law is often the only way to protect yourself if you become a media target.  The use of this law is not a strategy by "the man", it is individuals trying to defend their reputations.  To that point, Geoffrey Rush was successful on his defamation action, which shows that in his case, after all the evidence was considered, the media reporting in his case was not defensible.  Similarly, although his defamation action was abandoned, Craig McLachlan was acquitted of all charges against him.  These people are in the public eye, and had their jobs and lives destroyed by the media.  The only avenue they had to fight back was defamation law.  Bruce Lehrmann by way of contrast, when he took defamation action, was identified as a rapist, at least to the civil standard of proof, in circumstances where the criminal trial was aborted and no finding was reached to afford justice in that case.  For his part, Don Burke was the defendant in a defamation action, not the plaintiff.  Defamation law has done society, and the individuals concerned, a favour in all of those cases.
    0
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!