Login
Compensation for ousted Qantas staff still unclear despite union’s celebrations
Only three of the 1,700 ground handlers illegally outsourced by Qantas have a definitive compensation sum heading their way because of how the Transport Workers Union insisted on running its case, a recent Federal Court decision has made clear.
Naomi Neilson
In the hours after Justice Michael Lee handed down his compensation judgment, Transport Workers Union (TWU) national secretary Michael Kaine said the “vindicated” ground handlers illegally outsourced in early 2021 at 10 major airports deserved reparation “for the hell Qantas put them through”.
However, the celebrations have come too early, with Justice Lee making clear he could only identify a figure for three test cases based on their circumstances after the outsourcing. One person received $100,000, another $40,000, and the last $10,000.
The remaining 1,700 ground handlers will have to wait until TWU and Qantas meet in mediation – but even then, there is the possibility the parties could fail to come to a resolution. In that case, Justice Lee said the court would need to hear further submissions.
“Without assigning blame to either party, hopefully some common sense can prevail, after all the disputation that has taken place, including three separate hearings, six first instance judgments, three appeals (two by Qantas and one by the union), various notices of contention and interlocutory disputes,” Justice Lee said.
The delay can be partly chalked up to the method TWU ran its case, with Justice Lee making clear the union ignored his urgings to run the case as a class action – with the union as lead applicant – rather than the representative type of proceedings it stuck with.
Justice Lee said it was “somewhat difficult” to reconcile this course with the statutory requirement under the Federal Court Act that each party assists in the determination of disputes “as quickly, inexpensively and efficiently as possible”.
“Apparently, the union is content to rely on the prospect of there being an outbreak of cooperation between the parties in extrapolating my findings … to the broader cohort.
“One hopes they are right because how my findings as to common issues are to bind non-parties and provide any definitive legal certainty is unexplained (given I am deprived of the ability to make orders … as would be the case with a class action),” he said.
Justice Lee added in his judgment that it is “presently opaque” as to how any individualised findings – being the three test cases – could “inform the resolution of the claims by other affected employees absent some form of consensus”.
Any compensation received by the ground handlers will be limited to 12 months after they were outsourced, with Qantas having successfully argued in May that it would have found a way to terminate the staff one way or another by late 2021.
Justice Lee was satisfied it became “even more obvious that the rewards were clear” to Qantas and it would have proceeded with the termination “if the risks were appropriately minimised and managed”.
“Given Qantas’ laser-like determination to focus on cutting costs and the lack of priority it placed on the continuing employment of the affected workers, it is wholly unrealistic to think that outsourcing would never have occurred, and that a decision to do so would not have been made by around the time posited,” Justice Lee said.
“Having regard to the circumstances proved in the evidence … the degrees of probabilities or possibilities are such that absent the contravening conduct, I am satisfied that Qantas would have definitely decided to outsource by late 2021.”
Qantas and TWU have until early November to hold a mediation.
Naomi Neilson
Naomi Neilson is a senior journalist with a focus on court reporting for Lawyers Weekly.
You can email Naomi at:
