In his submissions, Cooke said Element Zero took a “scattergun approach to the alleged failures” and turned its application before Justice Brigitte Markovic into a “mini-trial on the merits”.

“Your Honour, no due disrespect to my learned friend, [but] what we saw yesterday was quintessential scattergun,” Cooke said.

“The litany of new, additional, unnotified arguments being flung across the table and thrown at Your Honour is quintessential of there being a scattergun approach and the efforts … to turn this into a mini-trial.”

During Monday’s submissions, Studdy accused Fortescue of making inaccurate and misleading submissions before Justice Perry to secure the raid on Element Zero’s offices and the homes of its former directors Bartlomiej Kolodziejczyk and Bjorn Winther-Jensen.

He said Fortescue’s prima facie case relied on evidence that material was deleted from work devices and emailed to personal addresses, but Justice Perry was allegedly not given all the information.

“Understandably, [Justice Perry] was thinking there must be something highly suspicious or fishy here,” Studdy told Justice Markovic.

Cooke said these submissions were “misconceived” and were premised on “misstatements of legal principles and a mischaracterisation of the evidence and submissions before Justice Perry”.

VIEW ALL

"The respondent's discharge application has been a monumental waste of time and a distraction from the real issues to be decided in this case [and] i appears to be a cynical attempt to delay the respondents having to file a defence and for the court and my client to obtain discovery in order to see the relevant evidence that has been preserved by the search orders," Cooke said.

He added that many of the allegations were not aired in written submissions prior to the hearing, forcing Fortescue to scramble together an aide memoire overnight so it could respond to the 27 new allegations.

Even if Justice Markovic accepted the new arguments advanced by Element Zero, Cooke said they are “not persuasive and not sufficient in all the circumstances” for the search orders to be discharged or varied.

Moreover, he said their submissions only served to “strengthen” Fortescue’s “already strong” prima facie case.

"If contrary to the applicant's position the court finds there was material non-disclosure, we respectfully submit it is in the interests of justice for the court to exercise its discretion not to set aside the search orders," Cooke said.