Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with
An affidavit mishap and disciplinary findings against barristers: What’s hot in law this week (22–26 April)
This week, UK-headquartered global law firms have named their new Australian partners, and the dust from Justice Lee’s verdict in the Lehrmann defamation proceedings continues to settle. Here is your weekly round-up of the biggest stories for Australia’s legal profession.
For the week from 22 April to 26 April, these were the 10 most-read stories on Lawyers Weekly (in case you missed them):
You’re out of free articles for this month
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
A Perth lawyer was hit with a $23,000 fine for carelessly affirming an affidavit despite a senior associate’s concerns.
A barrister’s name will be removed from the roll of practitioners for ignoring several orders not to engage in legal practice, including by sending defamation threats to this publication.
Legal experts weigh in on the key takeaways from Bruce Lehrmann’s defamation trial and make predictions about what may come next.
Global law firm Ashurst has promoted its “largest-ever cohort” to its partnership, with 17 of those new partners coming from Down Under.
A Sydney solicitor who admitted to deceiving a major retailer has lost a defamation fight with a small publication for the second time.
International law firm Allens has promoted five managing associates to the partnership across its Melbourne and Sydney offices.
A former Gadens employee who has dragged her feet on unfair dismissal proceedings was warned that one more request for adjournment could end up with her declared a vexatious litigant.
An NSW solicitor who has already landed in hot water for controversial social media posts has again failed to have an application for disciplinary proceedings tossed out before it could begin.
Charles Waterstreet, a barrister who was recently found to have sexually harassed three legal practitioners, asked a tribunal to remove a non-publication order protecting two of their names.
A former NSW barrister watched a sexually explicit video in front of a law student and showed a sex toy to a woman during a job interview.
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!