Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with
‘Unmeritorious’ litigation exposure and new BigLaw partners: What’s hot in law this week (22–26 Jan)
In the lead-up to Australia Day, concerns were flagged about the new Costs Protection Bill, and some of the nation’s largest practices have bolstered their partnership ranks. Here is your weekly round-up of the biggest stories for Australia’s legal profession.
For the week from 22 January to 26 January, these were the 10 most-read stories on Lawyers Weekly (in case you missed them):
You’re out of free articles for this month
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
An NSW man convicted of child sexual offences will be allowed to complete practical legal training.
Tesla’s application to have the Federal Court issue an arrest warrant for a man who allegedly shared leaked material online has been slammed by a judge as “ridiculous”, unrealistic, and “draconian”.
A Victorian solicitor who made a number of “scandalous” and unfounded allegations about the Chief Justice and other judicial officers of the Supreme Court has been removed from the roll.
Global law firm Norton Rose Fulbright has elevated three women to its partnership ranks in Australia.
As the legal industry continually evolves, 2024 will bring a multitude of challenges and opportunities for law students. Here, see key issues that these individuals need to be across this year, from final-year and award-winning law students themselves.
The Commonwealth government has reached a settlement with an underage girl who was sexually assaulted in Nauru.
Insurance practices face numerous challenges this year, and the Australian managing partner for global firm Kennedys is keen to meet those challenges head-on as the BigLaw practice looks to grasp the opportunities in front of it and leverage its strengths.
A bill designed to protect vulnerable people from adverse costs orders could be used by applicants to pursue “unmeritorious and protracted” litigation, the Law Council submits.
The Federal Court questioned whether litigation funders should receive data ahead of a 16-week trial brought by two class actions and a video game company against Apple and Google.
BigLaw firm Clayton Utz has promoted three new partners across a variety of practice areas.
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!