You have2 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 2 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.

Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

‘Rare’ precedent set for future estate matters

Macpherson Kelley lawyers have shed light on a recent Supreme Court matter they say will set a “rare and vital precedent” for wills and estates going forward.

user iconEmma Musgrave 28 September 2021 Big Law
‘Rare’ precedent set for future estate matters
expand image

Macpherson Kelley, acting for clients Ian and Kerry Haddow, have seen success in the Supreme Court in relation to a wills and estates matter.

The matter revolved around Mr Haddow’s deceased mother. In 2016, Mr Haddow had been left his mother’s entire estate to the exclusion of his brother, Colin Haddow; however, Colin sought to challenge the will relying on Part IV of the Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Victoria) (“APA”).

Colin’s legal representative filed an Originating Motion within the statutory limitation period of six months from the Grant of Probate. Significantly, Colin’s legal team put the estate on notice of their client’s intention to make an application but failed to serve the Originating Motion which would have put the estate on notice that the Originating Motion had actually been filed within the statutory limitation period, Macpherson Kelley said on the proceedings.

Macpherson Kelley swiftly identified the opportunity to contest the precise wording of the notice, timing requirements of the APA and the very limited case law in this area.

Appearing for Ian Haddow, Macpherson Kelley principal lawyer Joanne Hazeldene, associate Alanna Richmond and Teri Konstantinou of counsel said they needed to take a “bold approach to technical arguments”, which led to their success.

“We were watching the clock, Ms Richmond said.

Immediately upon the expiration of the limitation period, at 12.52pm we distributed the estate’s major asset (a property in regional Victoria) to Ian on the basis that we had only received notice of Colin’s intention to challenge the Will. Only an hour and 23 minutes later, we were notified that Colin’s Originating Motion had been filed.”

The firm noted that in her decision, Judicial Registrar Englefield ruled in favour of Ian, stating that “there is no real prospect that at trial it will be found that action lies against the defendants for having distributed the Property, on either of the plaintiff’s arguments regarding the effect of the Plaintiff’s First Letter under s 99A(3) of the Act.”

“[Given] the extremely small size of the remaining estate, there is no utility in this case proceeding any further,” Judicial Registrar Englefield said.

The matter, the firm said, serves as a rare and vital precedent for future litigation in the area.

 

Emma Musgrave

Emma Musgrave

Emma Musgrave (née Ryan) is the managing editor, professional services at Momentum Media.

Emma has worked for Momentum Media since 2015, including five years spent as the editor of the company's legal brand - Lawyers Weekly. Throughout her time at Momentum, she has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest stories in corporate Australia. In addition, she has produced exclusive multimedia and event content related to the company's respective brands and audiences. 

Prior to joining Momentum Media, Emma worked in breakfast radio, delivering news to the Central West region of NSW, before taking on a radio journalist role at Southern Cross Austereo, based in Townsville, North Queensland.

She holds a Bachelor of Communications (Journalism) degree from Charles Sturt University. 

Email Emma on: Emma.Musgrave@momentummedia.com.au 

Comments (4)
  • Avatar
    The had notice of the intention to file the claim, and distributed the estate regardless?
    Did they happen to check the Court portal by any chance?
    I doubt any judge will stand for it - but we will see. Someone put their insurers on notice.
    0
  • Avatar
    I read "we need to take a bold approach to technical arguments" as "we must win by any means and justice be damned". Stand by for the inevitable appeal...
    1
  • Avatar
    Guess these brothers won’t be having Christmas together…
    2
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!