Login
Breach of international laws ‘morally reprehensible’, advocacy group says
Legal advocates are concerned the Morrison government is comfortable in the knowledge that transferring a person outside of Australia who they understand could be harmed or killed will be in breach of international non-refoulement obligations.
Naomi Neilson
Before recent Federal Court proceedings, the Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs, Alex Hawke confirmed that he and his department will be knowingly breaching international non-refoulement obligations when removing a person from Australia they believe could be harmed or killed.
“This is a shocking and unprecedented development, indicating complete disregard by the Australian government for international law and standards, and its moral obligation not to expel people to harm,” Liberty Victoria wrote in a statement.
Non-refoulement obligations apply in respect of people whom the Australian government have assessed face a real risk of being “killed, tortured, prosecuted or subjected to the death penalty or other serious human rights abuses”. The obligations apply in international law to prevent forced expulsion of people and Australia is a signatory to the said laws that prohibit such acts.
“Liberty Victoria condemns this radical shift in policy. Not only is it morally and legally unjustifiable, but it may also cause irreparable harm to Australia’s international standing and reputation as a country that upholds and promotes human rights,” the advocacy body commented.
“A government saying it’s okay to send someone to a country where they know the person faces a real risk of being killed or tortured is morally reprehensible and deeply concerning. When Australia signed up to the Refugee Convention, we promised never to do this.”
Naomi Neilson
Naomi Neilson is a senior journalist with a focus on court reporting for Lawyers Weekly.
You can email Naomi at:
