You have0 free article left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 0 free article left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.

Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

Christian Porter speaks to rape allegations 

Federal Attorney-General Christian Porter has publicly confirmed that he is the cabinet minister accused of the rape of a 16-year-old girl more than 30 years ago but has strongly denied any wrongdoing. 

user iconNaomi Neilson 03 March 2021 Big Law
Christian Porter speaks to rape allegations 
expand image

TW: Please be aware that this article contains content around sexual assault and rape. 

The Attorney-General has denied that he assaulted the woman more than 30 years ago and said that the allegations were never put to him. In a press conference, Christian Porter commented: What has been put in various forms and allegations simply did not happen. In this last week I have tried to do what I have tried to do all of my life, [which is to] respect the rules and the processes and the law.”

Mr Porter said he has been subjected to a whisper campaign” and that, had he been approached, he would have said that nothing in the allegations that have been printed [by media] has ever happened”. 

He added that he waited to come forward until after NSW Police had concluded their consideration of the matter. He said that while he stayed silent, he has been subjected to the wildest.... accusations that I can remember in Australian politics

The Australian Women Lawyers (AWL) and president Leah Marrone have called for an urgent independent investigation into the allegations. 

“Until such investigation is conducted, the question remains as to whether the Attorney is an appropriately fit and proper person to hold that office. This uncertainty undermines the credibility and operation of the Australian legal system given the community’s expectations of the legal profession and the Attorney’s role in upholding the rule of law,” Ms Marrone said. 

On why he will not resign, Mr Porter said: “If I stand down from my position because of an allegation that simply did not happen, then any person in Australia can lose their career, their job and their life’s work based on nothing more than an accusation.”

He will be taking some leave for his own mental health. 

Last week, an anonymous 30-page letter was sent to several members of Parliament alleging that a cabinet minister had raped a 16-year-old girl in 1988, well before he entered politics. The woman in question died last year and NSW Police said the investigation into the matter had been closed because they had insufficient admissible evidence

Many ministers spent the last few days publicly calling for him to come forward, with some alleging that “every man and his dog” in Parliament already knew his identity. His position as a cabinet minister moving forward has also been called into question.  

Speaking to Sky News, Labor’s shadow minister Kristina Keneally said that there was a “case to be answered for” on whether he was still a fit and proper person to be a cabinet minister. 

Opposition Leader Anthony Albanese has also backed calls from friends of the woman for an inquiry into the allegation or an alternative “arms-length” investigation and said that it will not go away. He said, like the inquiry into former High Court justice Dyson Heydon, it needed the same attention. 

“It is very clear that, in my mind, this will require further leadership and action, Mr Albanese said. 

It comes after Mr Porter was accused of a long, storied history of sexist and inappropriate behaviour towards women in a Four Corners report in November last year. Barrister Kathleen Foley told the program that he was “deeply sexist and actually misogynistic in his treatment of women” during his university days. 

Help is available. Call Lifeline on 13 11 14. 

Naomi Neilson

Naomi Neilson

Naomi Neilson is a senior journalist with a focus on court reporting for Lawyers Weekly. 

You can email Naomi at: naomi.neilson@momentummedia.com.au

Comments (24)
  • Avatar
    According to the Attorney General - there is no longer the need for police, lawyers and the courts anymore. One only needs to say one didn't do it and that should be that. Quick - someone go let all those poor innocent people out of goal... most of them said they didn't 'do it'
    -2
    • Avatar
      Andrew son of his mother queen and his Prince is not charged at yet.
      0
  • Avatar
    It beggars belief that a trained lawyer, particularly one who is the AG of the nation, did not read the material that made these allegations in order to prepare a rebuttal against each & every one. Even if there is no truth to the matter you would still want to know what you are being accused of so that you could respond accordingly. Instead what you get is it never happened and I don't recall. Sorry, that is just not good enough, the lack of transparency just doesn't cut it. To be fair to him and the young lady in question only an independent enquiry can investigate the veracity of the allegations.
    1
    • Avatar
      That sounds fantastic, but how do you propose that they can "investigate the veracity" of the allegations?
      1
    • Avatar
      Beyond belief - started with interview with brit higgins and Lisa wilkinson - who cooked that up to snowball ????? - forms a pattern
      0
  • Avatar
    Notably he cried only when mentioning the impact on his own career. Not for the poor woman who committed suicide.

    The NSW Police did not investigate, as no complaint was made to them. Hence the calls for an independent investigation.
    -2
    • Avatar
      I can't believe that 2 people gave a thumbs-down for your (very reasonable) comment! You noted that he shed no tears for his accuser - only for the impact on his career. It was a point well made, so what does this say? You made some feel uncomfortable? Hmmm...
      0
    • Avatar
      His first comments were about the family of the deceased.
      0
  • Avatar
    Ms Maronne demands an "urgent independent investigation'?
    What does she think the NSW Police did?
    The matter has been investigated, no action has been taken. Mr Porter is entitled to the presumption of innocence.
    1
    • Avatar
      The NSW Police did not carry out any investigation.
      0
    • Avatar
      The police didn't investigate because the accuser has passed away. They can't take it to court, therefore the Police can do nothing. Nothing here says they think he is innocent, just the law prevents them from proceeding. I for one won't be presuming anything. I call for an independent inquiry. BTW, those tears were for himself and himself alone. He is scared.
      0
      • Avatar
        The police don't need the alleged victim to be alive to investigate a crime - if that were the case no murders would every be investigated. The NSW Police dropped the ball on this - they could have investigated the matter based on the letter, interviewed Mr Porter's fellow debaters who were sharing accomodation with him, the accuser's debating team who were also sharing accomodation with her, the teachers and other adults running the debate, etc. Then once these investigatory avenues had been pursued, the NSW Police could have askd Mr Porter to attend an interview to give a formal statement. Many cases are established on the basis of circumstantial evidence, without an eye witness. It seems to me that the NSW Police have created a mess by dropping the case on a faily flimsy pretext.
        0
      • Avatar
        NSW Police asay their investigation is closed. That presuposes there was one.
        They claim they considered the matter when contact was first made. They claim they sought advice after receiving the statement.
        Both were cursory as there was little evidence to look at, but it is incorrect to say that the claims were not investigated at all. The Police looked at it, decided there was no evidence, then chose not to proceed. That is what they do every day.
        1
      • Avatar
        Police met with her in Feb 2020, they "had regular contact with her", she emailed withdrawing her complaint on June 23, and thanked the investigators for the time and support they had given her.
        Police responded the next day.
        Sounds like the Police did something. You want to call it a non-investigation, go ahead. When the police confirm the investgation is closed, that suggests they think there was one.
        2
  • Avatar
    This whole thing is an absolute disgrace. Even if it were true, he was only 17 years old at the time and entitled to anonymity as a juvenile offender.
    What does Leah Maronne propose happen, dig the woman up and put a lie detector on her?

    For a long time, I have disliked Porter as a politician, ever since he was WA's A-G. But watching his press conference just now, I truly feel sorry for him to be dragged through the mud and dumped into an impossible situation like this.
    2
    • Avatar
      Says a man. You're comment about digging some one up, shows just how disrespectful you are. This is a lady who for some reason felt she had no other choice but to end her life. Your comment is truly disgusting.
      0
      • Avatar
        "for some reason"

        Isn't that the problem? Without knowing more the cause of her suicide is pure speculation.
        3
    • Avatar
      Actually, you need to check the facts there - he may have said he was 17 but he was 18 at the time, as all public records show - see what a difference that makes? An interesting slip don't you think?
      1
      • Avatar
        My understanding is that it was in the year he turned 18, but before his 18th birthday. Ergo, he was still 17 at the time.
        1
  • Avatar
    Due process should be uphold
    1
    • Avatar
      Yes, there needs to be an inquiry.
      0
    • Avatar
      Due process has been upheld under our legal system. It is just that for some this is does not satisfy them in this instance. Perhaps they should consider another system more appealing and move there. Maybe china or russia.
      1
      • Avatar
        No, this is nonsensical. There has been no due process. An independent inquiry is the only way to bring this regrettable situation to a satisfactory close for all concerned - one wonders why Mr Porter is not more enthusiastic about the idea. Without it, how can anyone come to any conclusions?
        1
        • Avatar
          No one has to come to any conclusions.
          This is the system we have. People are not obliged to prove their innocence of any allegation that someone wants to throw out.
          They are innocent until proven guilty. That process does not happen by way of 'independent inquiry'.
          Due process requires criminal allegations be aired and tested in a court if deemed sufficient to proceed to trial, not somewhere else. These allegations cannot be so tested now, and the NSW Police Commissioner considered they were unlikely to be so tested even if the complainant was still alive.
          It follows then that the AG remains innocent.
          I shake my head that this needs to be explained to a forum for lawyers.
          0
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!