You have4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.

Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

Open justice laws called into question with new consultation

Laws that govern disclosure and publication of court and tribunal information, including suppression orders, could be reformed as these undergo public consultation.

user iconNaomi Neilson 18 January 2021 Big Law
Mark Speakman
expand image

NSW Attorney-General Mark Speakman has called for consultations over the potential reforms of the state’s open justice laws, which he said are critical in ensuring that access is “fit-for-purpose” and remains relevant to the “changing society”. It could mean media and the public can access details that would normally be under a suppression order. 

 
 

Mr Speakman said the “media landscape has changed drastically” since its last review in 2013 and social media now means that people in a courtroom can share details just as it happens as “traditional methods of publication” have been transformed. 

“Open justice underpins our legal system,” Mr Speakman added. “As the saying goes, ‘justice not only has to be done but has to be seen to be done’. This principle will help to ensure the accountability and integrity of the courts [and] access to court information is an essential element of open justice. 

“However, in some circumstances the interests of justice require that some information is restricted, for example protecting the identities of children and victims of sexual offences.” 

Mr Speakman said the review will examine whether the right balance has been struck between the administration of justice, the rights of victims and witnesses, privacy and public safety, the right to a fair trial, and the public interest in open justice.

Naomi Neilson

Naomi Neilson

Naomi Neilson is a senior journalist with a focus on court reporting for Lawyers Weekly. 

You can email Naomi at: naomi.neilson@momentummedia.com.au

Comments (1)
  • Avatar
    Our courts and tribunals have a closed and secretive culture. I have tried twice and have been rejected twice when trying to get access to judges and litigants to have them participate in a Uni sanctioned research project where the voluntary participants would anonymously complete a
    questionnaire. With full research ethical clearance and safeguards in place. In both cases the head judge refused to even give a reason for the rejection. They don’t want any scrutiny whatsoever.
    0
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!