You have3 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 3 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.

Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

Victorian Bar criticised for having ‘no self-awareness’ in council announcement

The Victorian Bar has been accused of “silencing women” after ousting Kathleen Foley from its council just days after she publicly denounced the Attorney-General for alleged inappropriate conduct towards women.

user iconNaomi Neilson 13 November 2020 Big Law
Victorian Bar criticised for having ‘no self-awareness’ in council announcement
expand image

With the announcement of a new council came the swift accusations that Victorian Bar had sent a message to young women that if they complain about inappropriate conduct towards them, they will “pay a price”. At least, that is what many have taken away from the news that barrister Kathleen Foley has been ousted from the council.  

Only days earlier, Ms Foley alleged that Attorney-General Christian Porter was “deeply sexist and actually misogynistic in his treatment of women” in a Four Corners program that has been widely shared and has prompted Mr Porter to consider legal action.

“Do members of the Victorian Bar have no presence of mind, no self-awareness?” was the question asked — and shared broadly across social media — by former member with the Labor Party and economist Craig Emerson in a tweet published shortly after. 

“Whatever their reason for voting off Kathleen Foley, surely they [would] be aware that this sends a message to young women everywhere,” he said, adding: “Don’t complain about men’s behaviour or you will pay a price.” 

Writer and social commentator Jane Caro agreed, adding that she wondered whether it was “exactly the message they intended to send” to the wider community. 

The controversial accusations have been debated and picked apart with some arguing that Ms Foley — and former president Wendy Harris QC — were not re-elected because of their policies around education, awareness training and private events. 

Ruling against Ms Harris was the “Vote for Change” ticket which sought a clean sweep of all 21 council positions with a promise to reform the governing council. They raised concerns during the campaign about the use of council finances and whether they had advocated strongly enough for members of the Bar during the pandemic. 

Whatever the reason, the timing and a lack of official clarification from the Bar has not been responded to well. From the looks of some tweets, the Victorian Bar spent some part of their day fielding calls and emails from disgruntled Australians. 

When Lawyers Weekly asked for a response, the Victorian Bar chose not to comment. 

The below members form the new council:

Those with more than 15 years’ standing:

  •     Paul Holdenson QC
  •     Christopher Blanden QC
  •     Simon Marks QC
  •     Ian Freckleton QC
  •     Mary Anne Hartley QC
  •     Suzanne McNicol AM QC
  •     Róisín Annesley QC
  •     Helen Rofe QC
  •     Paul Hayes QC
  •     Eugene Wheelahan QC
  •     Darryl Burnett
Those with less than 15 years’ standing:

  •     Paul Kounnas
  •     Benjamin Murphy
  •     Robyn Sweet
  •     Amy Wood
  •     Ben Jellis
  •     Nawaar Hassan
Those with less than six years’ standing:

  •     Nicholas Phillpott
  •     Roshena Campbell
  •     Lana Collaris
  •     Lachlan Molesworth 

Naomi Neilson

Naomi Neilson

Naomi Neilson is a senior journalist with a focus on court reporting for Lawyers Weekly. 

You can email Naomi at: naomi.neilson@momentummedia.com.au

Comments (8)
  • Avatar
    I am concerned by this move by the Vic Bar. They should supporting people like, Kathleen, putting themselves out there to call out such deplorable behaviour of the leaders of our country. I thank Kathleen amd Rachelle for their strength and resolve. Xo
    0
  • Avatar
    Is it worth mentioning the fact that voting began on 28th October, well before this whole A-G issue became "news"?
    2
    • Avatar
      ...and when did voting close?
      0
      • Avatar
        The day after the Four Corners program was aired.
        In other words, only people who voted on the final day of a two-week voting period may (not necessarily were) influenced by the television show.
        1
  • Avatar
    They showed good judgment. Odious and unctious comments about others’ characters are not acceptable.
    0
    • Avatar
      "Are not acceptable"....

      (if such statements are made by a woman in respect of a man)
      -2
      • Avatar
        The Vic Bar should be more concerned about their own reputation given the lawyer X scandal, and the misleading of courts that has gone on.
        0
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!