You have4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.

Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

High-profile barrister controversially warns Lawyer X inquiry from DPP

A barrister who led the prosecutions of a corrupt Queensland Police chief has warned the Lawyer X inquiry from relying on the office of the DPP for investigations into officers that could be open to criminal charges following the final report.

user iconNaomi Neilson 22 October 2020 Big Law
Royal Commission into the Management of Police Informants
expand image

Controversially, the top prosecution barrister behind the trial of the corrupt Queensland Police chief Terry Lewis warned the Royal Commission into the Management of Police Informants (RCMPI) against relying on Victoria’s Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) to investigate police criminality for briefs of evidence following the final report. 

Douglas Drummond QC said public confidence is unlikely to be restored if any Victoria Police unit is left to investigate whether any of its current or former members, including the chief commissioners, have committed criminal offences. 

“That is what will very likely happen if the commission leaves it to the Victorian Director of Public Prosecutions to decide whether there are to be any criminal convictions,” he said.

As all evidence collected by the royal commission over its inquiry period was deemed inadmissible in court, fresh investigations would be needed in order to test the strength of the case and prepare the briefs of evidence for prosecutors. Mr Drummond said the investigations are not within the functions of the DPP or its office. 

“If Victoria Police control the investigations and preparation of briefs for the DPP, they will effectively determine who, if any, police will be prosecuted,” he said. “How can the public have confidence now that Victoria Police will be diligent in investigating and in preparing prosecution briefs against their own members?” 

The DPP has disagreed with this sentiment, claiming via a statement that the functions are carried out independently of Victoria Police and state’s Attorney-General. The office said its independence is underpinned by the Prosecutions Act 1994. 

However, it did concede that briefs of evidence are typically prepared by investigative agencies like Victoria Police but that decisions made in respect of prosecutions arising from the briefs are to be “made independently” of police influence. 

“Prosecutorial decisions are made on the basis of clearly stated criteria set out in the Policy of the Director of Public Prosecutions,” the office claimed. “I strongly reject the suggestion that such decisions are in any way influenced by political considerations.

“Such a suggestion is fundamentally inconsistent with the Directors’ role and statutory frameworks under which the office of the Director is established.” 

Mr Drummond also ruled out leaving the investigation to the Independent Broad-based Anti-Corruption Commission (IBAC) as it has been “largely neutered” by the government and its lack of funding. 

He said an agency responsible for the investigations of police conduct and preparation of briefs should be at “arm’s length” of IBAC, “which has already decided that police did not engage in any criminal conduct”. 

Mr Drummond instead asked the royal commission to consider in its final report the likelihood of establishing a special prosecutor who would be resourced with staff and budget necessary to complete all investigations necessary to prepare sufficient briefs of evidence. 

This prosecutor, he added, should be independent of political direction, “in contrast with the DPP” who he said acts in accordance to the Attorney-General’s directions. 

“The Andrews Government has benefited politically from various recent actions by Victoria Police. The government has relied on Victoria Police, led by its senior officers, to rigorously enforce the harsh lockdown decrees the government has issued during the coronavirus pandemic,” Mr Drummond said. 

“There should not be room for any perception that decisions whether any serving or former Victoria Police should be prosecuted may be subject to political influence keen to ensure continuing police support.”

Naomi Neilson

Naomi Neilson

Naomi Neilson is a senior journalist with a focus on court reporting for Lawyers Weekly. 

You can email Naomi at: naomi.neilson@momentummedia.com.au

Tags
Comments (2)
  • Avatar
    I am shocked. How could anybody find anything bad to say about the Victorian police?
    0
  • Avatar
    Douglas Drummond raises legitimate concerns. VicPol ran dead on the Red Shirts to the benefit of the Labor Govt. if brief preparation is left to VicPol, the DPP may never see some evidence in order to adjudicate on it. VicPol displays many of the same corruption indicators as QPol did in the 1980s and NSWPol did in the 1980-99s. Both of those agencies required complete overhauls. VicPol requires the same and the RCMPI has shown that. Nothing less than an independent prosecutor will give the public of Victoria the comfort it is entitled to.
    0
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!