You have1 free article left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 1 free article left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.

Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

Guilty solicitor given until June 2021 to practice

A Victorian solicitor has been granted until June 2021 to practice before he must cease completely after a tribunal found he had engaged in professional misconduct.

user iconNaomi Neilson 09 September 2020 Big Law
Guilty solicitor given until June 2021 to practice
expand image

In his first disciplinary hearing in 44 years, sole practitioner Sergio Guerra was ordered to close his trust account and cease practicing in June 2021 after a tribunal found that he had engaged in professional misconduct in two separate complaints. 

Mr Guerra’s practice has been confined for the next 10 months. He will no longer have the power to conduct family law matters or operate a trust account, “which represents the removal of one of the major risk factors for practitioners”. When considering these orders, the tribunal noted that Mr Guerra readily accepted accountability. 

In the first complaint, Mr Guerra was found to have failed to inform his client of a critical hearing in his matter and organise representation. He also failed to respond to serious communication on behalf of his client over the course of his 12-month retainer. 

Mr Guerra told the tribunal he was reluctant to represent this client as he typically did not engage in family law matters but the client was the son of an old, deceased friend. Mr Guerra informed the client he would not charge him, and he never did. 

The tribunal found it was a “significant failing” to discharge his obligations to his client, with adverse consequences: “The nature of this failure is such that it clearly amounts to a substantial failure to reach or maintain reasonable standards of competence.” 

In the second complaint, the tribunal found that Mr Guerra was tasked with the equal split of an estate between two daughters. A final order was made in October 2013 but his failure to respond to correspondence from the opposing solicitor meant the matter dragged on until September 2016. In June 2016, he also failed to pay relevant monies.

The tribunal found that he had failed to respond to correspondence from the Victorian Legal Services Commissioner, a failing that also constituted professional misconduct. 

“It is important for effective operation of regulatory systems that practitioners respond within a specified period to such statutory information requests,” the tribunal wrote in its judgement. “If they do not respond promptly, the regime for the protection of public through the investigation of potentially harmful conduct is adversely affected.” 

This case can be found on Austlii: Victorian Legal Services Commissioner v Guerra (Legal Practice) [2020] VCAT 947

Naomi Neilson

Naomi Neilson

Naomi Neilson is a senior journalist with a focus on court reporting for Lawyers Weekly. 

You can email Naomi at: naomi.neilson@momentummedia.com.au

Comments (0)
    Avatar
    Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
    The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
     
    The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
    The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
    Posting as
    You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!