You have1 free article left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 1 free article left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.

Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

Victoria courts to refresh youth charges

Under a proposed suite of changes, the Sentencing Advisory Council has advised that all courts go easier on youth offenders and expand the funding into regional areas of Victoria.

user iconNaomi Neilson 04 June 2020 Big Law
youth charges
expand image

As part of research into youth offenders, Victoria’s Sentencing Advisory Council called for laws that would force the state’s courts into considering a young criminal’s history in out-of-home care and any previous trauma that may relate to their sentencing.

The move has garnered the attention of critics, but council deputy chair Lisa Ward said a change would favour rehabilitation over punishment. A reform could also see the criminal justice system better manage youth offenders and prevent future reoffending.

“Many children who have started offending have themselves been victims of crime,” said Ms Ward. “Childhood trauma affects children’s physical and neurological development in ways that increase their likelihood of offending. By recognising and addressing childhood trauma, [courts will see] there is a vital crime prevention strategy.”

The report “Crossover Kids” by the council found there is no current legislative guidelines and only limited case law on the relevance of trauma, including child abuse, to sentencing youths. It also identified barriers to fully informing sentencing without a child’s history.

Currently, the courts are required to consider factors including the age and criminal history of a youth offender, but there is no express reference to the relevance of prior trauma.

“The current legislation specifies matters that courts should consider when they sentence children, but there is no express reference to the relevance of childhood trauma,” said Ms Ward. “Our research indicates that this should be addressed.

“We know that a child’s early involvement in the criminal justice system predicts ongoing involvement in crime. If we can effectively address this trauma, we can [help avoid] any lifetime of damage to children, their families and the community.”

In addition to considering past trauma, the council has also called for extra funding for all regional courts that specailise in youth offending. It also called for a pretrial youth justice group conferencing to intervene early and to empower courts to order that child protection workers attend if the Department of Health and Human Services is responsible for a child.

Naomi Neilson

Naomi Neilson

Naomi Neilson is a senior journalist with a focus on court reporting for Lawyers Weekly. 

You can email Naomi at: naomi.neilson@momentummedia.com.au

Comments (0)
    Avatar
    Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
    The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
     
    The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
    The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
    Posting as
    You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!