Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

Legal profession ‘not immune’ to community losing faith in institutions

In the wake of findings that ethical perceptions of law societies have once again decreased, it is incumbent upon our member associations to uphold “high ethical standards, continuing education and rigorous regulatory oversight of our profession”.

user iconJerome Doraisamy 21 November 2019 Big Law
Stuart Webb
expand image

Yesterday, Lawyers Weekly reported that the Ethics Index 2019, released last week by Governance Institute of Australia, had found that just over half (54 per cent) of Australians see law societies as being ethical – 37 per cent said somewhat ethical and 17 per cent said very ethical – while one in five (21 per cent) sees such societies as unethical (16 per cent said somewhat unethical and five per cent said very unethical).

The net ethical score of 33 marks a decline from last year, during which law societies recorded a net ethical score of 37. This year’s results are a long way from the results of 2017, at which point law societies had a net ethical score of 42.

In response to the findings, Law Institute of Victoria president Stuart Webb said: “I think it is clear that the community generally is losing faith in institutions, and the legal profession is not immune.”

“It is not surprising, though it is disappointing, that the Governance Institute reports a decline in support for associations this year, particularly as the profession and Victoria Police are under the scrutiny of the Royal Commission into the Management of Police Informants currently,” he said.

“We need to stand united – solicitors, barrister and the regulators, to reinforce the high ethical standards, continuing education and rigorous regulatory oversight of our profession.”

Incoming Australian Bar Association president Matthew Howard SC supported this, noting that the findings were troubling.

“Where legal member organisations want to contribute to public debate on topics, they do so most effectively when they have credibility with the audience they are talking to. So, the findings are of concern,” he said.

“The broad majority of lawyers do want their member organisations to have a voice in important public issues. Certainly, at the ABA, the expectations of our members in this regard contribute to the way that the ABA seeks to engage in public debate.”

Looking at the issues more philosophically, Law Council of Australia president Arthur Moses SC mused that law societies are, and must remain, responsible for assisting solicitors to deliver services that are of the highest professional and ethical standards.

“Law societies perform this role through increased emphasis on education, professional development and supporting the profession to comply with the ethical requirements of practice,” he posited.

“Law societies also provide important services that inform and connect members of the community with lawyers. These can include solicitor referral services, pro bono schemes, after-hours assistance in criminal law matters, information guides to finding the right lawyer for the individual’s legal problems and first interview schemes.

“A significant amount of the services which are undertaken by law societies for the benefit of the community [are] often done behind the scenes. Accordingly, the public may not be aware of the significant amount of work which is undertaken for the benefit of the community by law societies and solicitors.”

When asked how best legal member associations can regain the trust of the broader community, Mr Howard said: “Member organisations must always be seen to be bringing an independent, professional perspective to the topic they are speaking on. That means speaking with restraint and always in the public interest.”

Mr Webb supported this, noting that member associations have to engage with the broader community to uphold the importance and benefits of membership.

“Member associations are a key focus point for advocating for justice on behalf of the broader community, as well as upholding the highest standards of the profession. Member associations need to continue to communicate to the broader community to reinforce the value of membership. This includes by promoting specialist services and qualifications such as our legal referral service, ethics and practice support service and our accredited specialist program,” he said.

Ultimately, Mr Moses espoused, “member associations for the legal profession continuously work to build and maintain the trust of the broader community through being open to self-growth and improvement".

Queensland Law Society was also approached for comment but had not replied as of the time of filing this story. 

Jerome Doraisamy

Jerome Doraisamy

Jerome Doraisamy is the managing editor of Lawyers Weekly and HR Leader. He is also the author of The Wellness Doctrines book series, an admitted solicitor in New South Wales, and a board director of the Minds Count Foundation.

You can email Jerome at: jerome.doraisamy@momentummedia.com.au 

Comments (4)
  • Avatar
    I am not surprised. Have brought the most serious misconduct to the attention of a law society. Thousands of people affected and utter inaction. As a lawyer of many years experience it’s just unbelievable how long it takes for something to be done. It’s not just the legal regulators. It’s across the board. ASIC, the ACCC. Never seen so much passing the buck in my life.
    0
  • Avatar
    Lawyers are at the center of the of decline in the general faith in institutions!

    Too much red tape and regulation.

    Too many lawyers in local, state and federal governments.

    Too many judges usurping parliament and through imagining implied rights.
    0
  • Avatar
    It's the legal profession generally that the community questions. Everyday Australians can't access justice anymore, so perception is legal industry there to help the rich. So of course community don't trust us, why would they?
    0
  • Avatar
    In December 2018, the Supreme Court of New South Wales found the Law Society of NSW had sent false and untruthful correspondence to a solicitor on more than one occasion, there had been a denial of procedural fairness, and there was delay and tardiness on the part of the Law Society. When the credibility of the Law Society of NSW is called into question like that it is only going to reflect badly on the membership.
    6
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!