You have1 free article left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 1 free article left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.

Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

Victoria modernises criminal appeal system

New laws designed to modernise the Victorian criminal appeals system have this week passed Parliament, making the appeals proceedings more efficient.

user iconNaomi Neilson 18 November 2019 Big Law
Jill Hennessy
expand image

The legislation will reduce the burden on victims with de novo appeals abolished. With this change, if a person is found guilty and seeks to appeal their conviction, the County Court no longer needs to hear all evidence again to reach a new decision.

Attorney-General Jill Hennessy said: “These new laws are about delivering Victorians the modern, efficient and fair appeals system they deserve.”

Conviction appeals will now be decided on transcript of evidence from original hearing with further evidence received only if the County Court considers it relevant. Witnesses and victims will not be required to “suffer through the traumatising process of providing evidence for a second time during the appeal proceedings”.

The de novo appeals against final orders made by the Family Division of the Children’s Court will also be abolished in favour of the new reforms.

Also getting a change up are sentence appeals, which will now be determined on the evidence and materials already before the court and may only be allowed if the County Court finds there are substantial reasons to impose a different sentence.

The AG’s office said the magistrate’s reasons for the original sentence must be taken into account when considering whether to approve the appeal process.

The new laws will create a second or subsequent right of appeal of convictions for the indictable offences, which will allow the judicial system to determine whether there is a substantial miscarriage of justice and whether a prisoner should be retried.

“Once a convicted person has exhausted their appeal rights under the existing system, the only avenue to have a conviction overturned is via the petition for mercy process, whereby the Attorney-General must decide whether to refer the matter to the Court of Appeal for consideration or to the governor for a pardon,” the AG explained.

A second or subsequent right of appeal will allow a convicted person who has already exhausted their appeal rights, to appeal again only if fresh and compelling evidence emerges that the court considers warrants an appeal.

Second appeals will only be available in “exceptional circumstances”, and applicants will have to show their case meets strict legal criteria.

“Convicted persons will now have a right to appeal their conviction if fresh, compelling evidence of a potential substantial miscarriage of justice comes to light – and the court rather than politicians will consider that appeal,” Ms Hennessy said.

naomi.neilson@momentummedia.com.au

Naomi Neilson

Naomi Neilson

Naomi Neilson is a senior journalist with a focus on court reporting for Lawyers Weekly. 

You can email Naomi at: naomi.neilson@momentummedia.com.au

Comments (5)
  • Avatar
    So in the case celebre of Victoria, we have already seen this in practice?

    In Pell v R a 'second trial' (de novo?) was effectively held and then the Appeals Court was effectively treated to this video trial with the voluntary, and in hindsight, foolish Police phising interview played as the de facto 'defendant on the stand' and the Crown witness also 'replayed' as a modern invention.

    Perhaps we will soon have a Logie Award for best court performance, and why only one? Best performance in original trial, Best performance in an Appeal?

    Gotta love Victoria - where the Police State is nothing more that a reality TV program for the National Broadcaster!
    0
    • Avatar
      Wow, my thoughts exactly.

      I would add that there seems to be a determination by Victorian courts to make themselves so streamlined and efficient that they don't actually put any time and effort into determining guilt or innocence and justice comes down to whatever ends the case as quickly as possible. All of which requires a presumption of guilt.
      0
  • Avatar
    This is outrageous and designed to secure convictions
    0
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!