You have2 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 2 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.

Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

Lawyers’ working hours – who cares?

I can’t put it better than a feeling that there is a seismic turn – we are on the crest of a wave – when it comes to lawyers’ wellbeing, and what might be done to improve it, writes Polly Harding.

user iconEmma Musgrave 04 February 2019 Big Law
Polly Harding
expand image

I turned up the car radio very loud and shut down the ever present cricket chatter from my son when I yesterday heard no less than Linda Mottram on ABC’s PM – a journalist who I very much admire – introduce the topic of “royal commission lawyers working grueling 16 hour days” in the context of the forthcoming recommendations from the banking royal commission.

The slot examined law firm culture which measured productivity in terms of hours of attendance and a “culture of competitiveness” that pitches lawyers against each other to be in the office for more and more hours.

There’s nothing new in this. Way back in 1980s London, working in the most prestigious “magic circle” law firm in the city, leaving jackets on the back of chairs to indicate a presence in the office well into the night was very common practice.

While we can sustain hard work and long hours for some periods of time (indeed working hard in an intellectually stimulating environment can be a very positive thing), it is always a matter of degree. It’s the constant and unremitting requirements to work ridiculous hours which appear to be doing the harm.

An article in last week’s AFR by Natasha Gillezau and Elouise Fowler explored what it’s like working as a young corporate lawyer at a top-tier firm. Just like the “location, location, location” mantra for house hunters, “working hours, working hours and working hours” is what really ails these young commercial lawyers. As the AFR piece points out, the fallout for firms and for individual lawyers is significant.

So where to next?

This is a huge topic – and certainly not one which can be tackled in a short article. However, we are as a profession “all in this together”.

Law firms

Law firms (of all shapes and sizes) know that, for commercial, humanitarian and other reasons, that change needs to happen. Lawyers’ wellbeing is good for business.

However, change isn’t going to happen overnight. Clients’ demands and law firms’ responses to them are deeply embedded. But without doubt there is now a groundswell of will for change and change WILL follow.

Individual lawyers

I’ve said it before – and I’m sure I’ll say it again- but never forget that you have choices.

Just as you bear in mind when choosing your significant other, no relationship with your work (a relationship like any other) is perfect. You need to decide, honestly, what matters to you – and what is non-negotiable – and manage the rest.

If commercial law isn’t for you – hey, if law isn’t for you, come clean and take whatever steps you need to for change.

You only live once.

Clients

Clients have responsibilities too. I was a client, working in-house for many years. It’s my belief that clients have a responsibility to consider the lawyers and law firms they instruct – and the impact of how they do that.

I remember, many years ago, reading an interview with a very prominent in-house lawyer at Telstra. He emphasized that while he worked hard to support requests within his teams for flexible or part-time working it was equally important to him that he replicated that support and consideration for external lawyers in the expectations placed on those external firms.

When it’s possible (and I admit I’ve never had a job which saw me staring down the barrel of a royal commission) think about the expectations we are placing on our external counsel.

For example, could managing things better at our end (including managing our own internal clients) relieve the pressure, in some small way, on those that we are asking (and paying) to do legal work for us?

I, for one, am looking forward to the changes which surely lie ahead.

Polly Harding is a principal and lawyer at Counsel on Demand.

Emma Musgrave

Emma Musgrave

Emma Musgrave (née Ryan) is the managing editor, professional services at Momentum Media.

Emma has worked for Momentum Media since 2015, including five years spent as the editor of the company's legal brand - Lawyers Weekly. Throughout her time at Momentum, she has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest stories in corporate Australia. In addition, she has produced exclusive multimedia and event content related to the company's respective brands and audiences. 

Prior to joining Momentum Media, Emma worked in breakfast radio, delivering news to the Central West region of NSW, before taking on a radio journalist role at Southern Cross Austereo, based in Townsville, North Queensland.

She holds a Bachelor of Communications (Journalism) degree from Charles Sturt University. 

Email Emma on: Emma.Musgrave@momentummedia.com.au 

Comments (6)
  • Avatar
    But no firm is forcing people to stay back ... if they aren't exceeding their budgets more than the next person then that is their own fault for being inefficient ... you said it yourself "If commercial law isn’t for you – hey, if law isn’t for you, come clean and take whatever steps you need to for change." and right there is why this isn't changing any time soon and it's why instead of talent, we are attracting unscrupulous lawyer jokes.
    0
  • Avatar
    Clients have responsibilities too? Try explaining that theory to your average family law client.
    2
  • Avatar
    I fear that it is wishful thinking to hope that things are actually on the verge of changing for the better. The whole big law firm model is predicated on leverage junior lawyer churn. I had a partner at one of the big global firms telling me fairly recently that there was some thinking that the law firms should start to stop hiring junior lawyers full time and instead put them all on casual contracts and just call them in as required. I have never known law firm partners to be truly motivated by anything other than their individual pay packets.
    1
  • Avatar
    Less than 12 hours a day? But they might cut the Tim Tams.
    0
  • Avatar
    Twelve hours worked rarely translates to twelve effective hours. A lot of it will be devoted to navel-gazing and ‘busy work’. Law firms need to develop a system that rewards rapid commercial results not time spent, for the sake of lawyers and clients.
    0
    • Avatar
      They already did. Put a huge team of cheap, eager, juniors onto the case, managed by a Partner to ensure that they are all working harder than they ever imagined possible. This gets rapid and very cost effective results ... those who navel gaze or are "busy" but not productive get turfed fast, after all there's a hundred more champing at the bit for that position.
      0
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!