You have4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.

Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

How G+T is responding to the SafeWork NSW notice

Gilbert+Tobin managing partner Danny Gilbert has outlined how the BigLaw firm is taking action following notification of “apparent work, health and safety issues”, pertaining to the supposed use of “high caffeinated stimulants” at the firm, emphasising workplace culture as being key moving forward.

user iconJerome Doraisamy 10 December 2018 Big Law
Danny Gilbert

responding to the SafeWork NSW notice

expand image

Speaking to Lawyers Weekly, Mr Gilbert said the notice received from WorkCover authority SafeWork NSW raised “apparent work, health and safety issues” in relation to the alleged use of illegal drugs in the workplace, people working under the influence (“presumably of illegal drugs”) and that workers may be at risk due to “inadequate drug and alcohol polices and procedures”.

What has since emerged, he said, following enquiries with SafeWork and internally, is the substances involved were instead “high caffeinated stimulants”, commonly used for pre-gym workouts, which the authority was notifying the firm of.

“If there was more to an allegation of illegal drugs, the notice would not have said, ‘we don’t intend to investigate any further’. There is no evidence that people were using them so they could work long hours,” he said.

However, in an email to all staff following receipt of the notice and subsequent media reporting, Mr Gilbert wrote that “the topics raised are very concerning” and that he was “saddened that someone at G+T felt unable to use [internal] channels [to raise concerns].”

“I want all of us to feel empowered to speak up,” he wrote.

“I am concerned that members of our firm may be using legal ‘stimulant’ drinks. While legal, these seem to be a very unhealthy choice. There is certainly no expectation that anyone should be working to the point that they feel they need such products.”

In conversation with Lawyers Weekly, Mr Gilbert said – in addition to the firm’s existing policies and “zero tolerance” attitude toward illegal drug use – an internal review of G+T’s policies and practices for managing individual and team workloads has been undertaken.

This review will help “identify opportunities for improvement”, he said, with a cultural solution being paramount.

“I don’t think that the solution speaks of a prescriptive rules-based system where you get rigidity. I think we are going to have better processes for checking in on people and getting a cultural mindset around partners getting people to stop and take a breather, and the HR reps we have in every group have to watch it,” he said.

“It has to be a team effort. You have to have a culture where people can put their hands up and not fear that there is some kind of negative view that would be held about them if they do.”

A layer of individual responsibility is also important, he added, further to a suggestion from this writer. However, for people to “find that voice, you have to have a culture that allows that voice to be heard”, and where people can feel safe about such disclosures, he posited.

“Much of what I’ve done in the last few years has been directed towards those outcomes,” he said.

“The whole reason for open plan [offices, for example] is not because I get into the debate about what’s more efficient or not. I’m not so interested in efficiency over effectiveness and culture.”

“If people are visible, their voices are visible, and that’s a better way.”

Mr Gilbert said he doesn’t think the firm – or any firm, for that matter – will find a perfect solution, but “we’ve got to do a better job”.

“It might take a bigger investment of money to do that, but that’s what has to be done.”

Jerome Doraisamy

Jerome Doraisamy

Jerome Doraisamy is the managing editor of Lawyers Weekly and HR Leader. He is also the author of The Wellness Doctrines book series, an admitted solicitor in New South Wales, and a board director of the Minds Count Foundation.

You can email Jerome at: jerome.doraisamy@momentummedia.com.au 

Comments (5)
  • Avatar
    I love how G&T and KWM were both confused about why staff did not raise their concerns internally. It’s because when you do you are told to take a teaspoon of cement and harden up. Or in this case, pre-workout. Cement is probably a healthier option though.
    0
  • Avatar
    It's an open secret that G+T expects its staff to consistently work very long hours (even by top tier law firm standards). Perhaps Danny should reflect on whether the expectations of his staff are so unreasonable that this is why they felt unable to carry out their work without resorting to stimulants and/or unable to raise the issue with higher ups.
    7
  • Avatar
    Most people would say that open plan offices for lawyers ADDS to workplace stress.
    2
  • Avatar
    Do you even lift, brah?
    2
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!