Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

10-plus firms make the cut in WGEA list

Over 10 law firms have been awarded the Employer of Choice for Gender Equality citation by the Australian government’s Workplace Gender Equality Agency (WGEA).

user iconEmma Musgrave 22 February 2018 Big Law
10-plus firms in WGEA list
expand image

Yesterday, the WGEA announced its list of 2017-18 WGEA Employer of Choice for Gender Equality (EOCGE) citation holders, with a record of 120 organisations being named.

The citation recognises employer commitment and best practice in promoting gender equality in Australian workplaces.

WGEA director Libby Lyons said the steady growth in the list indicated that the business benefits and competitive advantage gained by improving gender equality in Australian workplaces were becoming ever more widely recognised.

Ms Lyons said trends among this year’s recipients include entrenching organisation-wide flexible work; programs to support women into leadership; tailored parental leave policies to support use by both women and men; initiatives to attract women into male-dominated roles; supporting men’s caring responsibilities; and robust analysis and correction of gender pay gaps.

“I am particularly delighted to see some of the innovative and exciting initiatives by our EOCGE citation holders covering, among other things, flexibility, paid parental leave, supporting women in leadership and addressing gender pay gaps,” said Ms Lyons.

“WGEA data shows there is continuing momentum and progress towards gender equality in Australian workplaces. However, it also highlights the accountability gap between having a policy or strategy in place and being held accountable for delivering results.

“Leadership and accountability are essential if real progress is to be made in shifting the entrenched gender divisions in Australian workplaces. That is why the work of our EOCGE citation holders is so important. It is only through more employers showing this type of leadership and accountability that we will see the pace of real change increase.

“I congratulate all the 2017-18 citation holders for their commitment to and recognition of the many benefits improved gender equality can bring to their business. These employers are setting the benchmark and the pace for other Australian workplaces to follow.”

The law firms taking out a citation in this year’s list are:

Speaking about his firm’s award, Ashurst managing partner Paul Jenkins said: “We are proud to be consistently acknowledged as being at the forefront of driving change in gender diversity.”

“It is a reflection of the values and culture we have at Ashurst, as achieving gender equality is a critical part of the firm’s strategy and commitment to deliver better outcomes for our people and clients,” he said.

This is the 17th consecutive year Ashurst has had its commitment to diversity and inclusion formally recognised by the WGEA Employer of Choice for Gender Equality citation.

The firm noted it is the only law firm to be consecutively awarded the citation by the WGEA, and its predecessor the EOWA, since its inception in 2001.

Also commenting on his firm's achievement, Clayton Utz chief executive partner Rob Cutler said the citation reflected the effectiveness of the firm's approach and its progress in cultivating workplace diversity and inclusion.

"We have achieved marked improvement through identifying and targeting the systemic issues hindering gender equality," Mr Cutler said.

"One mark of our progress is our female partnership target. In 2014, we committed to improving the representation of women in the partnership and set a target of 35 per cent women partners by 2025. In the last three years, we've moved from 19 per cent to 27 per cent women partners. We strongly believe this trend will continue in the coming years."

Corrs Chambers Westgarth partner and CEO John W.H. Denton AO also spoke out about his firm’s recognition.

“Ensuring a diverse and equitable workplace in which everyone can develop to their full potential benefits our people, our clients and the firm,” Mr Denton said.

“My, and the firm’s, commitment to gender equality is unwavering. Gender equality and diversity are not just ethical issues, they are key to driving a successful and healthy business and, in the case of Corrs, ensuring we attract and retain talented people of any gender.

“Maintaining and encouraging a diverse, equitable, inclusive and open-minded work environment is not something we take for granted. We are constantly working to encourage flexibility, inclusiveness and the wellbeing of our people to make Corrs an inspiring workplace in which collaboration, learning and knowledge sharing thrive,” he said.

This is the 11th consecutive time Corrs has been awarded a citation.

In addition, DLA Piper’s co-managing partner in Australia Jim Holding noted his firm’s delight to be recognised consistently since 2014.

“We remain absolutely committed to gender equality,” Mr Holding said.

“Our female partners currently make up just over 26 per cent of our Australian partnership, and we are working hard to ensure our future pipeline of female talent not only sees themselves with a future in leadership, but that they are actively encouraged and supported to achieve it.”

For Gilbert + Tobin managing partner Danny Gilbert, the citation, awarded for the fourth consecutive year, reflects the continued progress his firm is making in supporting women at all levels and building an inclusive workforce.

“Our firm has a long and proud history of celebrating diversity and advocating for equality. We are honoured to continue to be recognised as a WGEA Employer of Choice and we remain committed to playing a leading role in achieving gender equality in Australia,” he said.

“While we are making good progress, we know we have more to do to ensure G+T is a place where both men and women can build rewarding careers for the long-term – a focus that our new Diversity Council will take forward in 2018 and beyond.”

Holding Redlich national managing partner Ian Robertson also responded to his firm being awarded a citation for the 10th year, noting that the gruelling submission process only sees the best of the best for general equality and inclusion recognised.

“This is the 10th year that Holding Redlich has received this citation – which is a recognition which must be earned every year,” Mr Robertson said.

“Each year we must demonstrate precisely what our firm is doing to encourage gender equality – and also how we are building upon initiatives that are already in place.”

“I am very pleased that these efforts have received this high-level recognition. It is also heartening to see such strong support and commitment across our firm to ensuring our workplace is a fair, welcoming and enjoyable environment for all.”

Meanwhile, Maddocks CEO Michelle Dixon also praised her firm’s commitment to the cause, saying that it’s pleasing to be recognised with a citation for the 14th consecutive year.

“It is important for our people and our business that everyone receives the same incentives and opportunities that come from doing your job well,” Ms Dixon said.

“The programs, policies and initiatives we have implemented over the past decade have been designed to emphasise the value our employees bring to the firm.

“Our success over that time, with significant partner, employee and revenue growth, is proof that gender equality is an important step towards business success.”

Lastly, Russell Kennedy managing partner Paul Gleeson said the citation achievement is a piece of a larger firm wide approach.

“The WGEA EOCGE citation fits with our ‘make a difference’ philosophy and forms part of our journey to continue to shape the culture of our firm. I’m pleased to take the lead as chair of Russell Kennedy's Gender Equality Committee," he said.

Lawyers Weekly is keen to hear your take on gender equality in the legal profession. If you have a story you'd like to share about your firm's flexibility, paid parental leave policy, general gender pay gaps in the industry, and opportunities and/or positions available to minorities, please get in touch via editor@lawyersweekly.com.au 

Emma Musgrave

Emma Musgrave

Emma Musgrave (née Ryan) is the managing editor, professional services at Momentum Media.

Emma has worked for Momentum Media since 2015, including five years spent as the editor of the company's legal brand - Lawyers Weekly. Throughout her time at Momentum, she has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest stories in corporate Australia. In addition, she has produced exclusive multimedia and event content related to the company's respective brands and audiences. 

Prior to joining Momentum Media, Emma worked in breakfast radio, delivering news to the Central West region of NSW, before taking on a radio journalist role at Southern Cross Austereo, based in Townsville, North Queensland.

She holds a Bachelor of Communications (Journalism) degree from Charles Sturt University. 

Email Emma on: Emma.Musgrave@momentummedia.com.au 

Tags
Comments (22)
  • Avatar
    I started my legal career at one of these "multi-award" firms and I can tell you - it was the worst experience of my life and put me off pursuing the career any further... and the funny thing is that all the bullying was done by a workplace relations partner. Whoever gives these citations out should really ask those who have experienced the firm's true culture first hand. Absolute joke!
    0
  • Avatar
    I have worked for 3 of the firms on that last - 2 of them as a Special Counsel. I also call bullshit - and the firm who has received the citation '11 years in a row' was one of the worst.
    3
  • Avatar
    Some perspective.... Wednesday, 28 February 2018
    I have worked as an equity partner at two of the cited firms, and know many in management at the others. I can attest that not all of these firms are the same. Some are genuinely committed. For others, it's window dressing and they have managed to somehow achieve the citation (which I understand is about much more than just demonstrating you have the policies in place). The real challenge is that there remains pockets of non compliance, and inconsistencies within firms, across teams and different offices. I was alarmed to hear horror stories of things which went on at my previous firms, things I had never witnesses. Firms need to do more to weed out these dinosaurs, and not continue to give them safe harbour because they have large practices.
    3
    • Avatar
      Were not talking about the odd 'dinosaur' here. We are talking about a situation where these firms are so toxic and harbor such toxic environments behind the 'window dressing'. With policies that are not worth the paper they are written on. It is partners and their profit over people. To the management who operate firms with toxic cultures and the spineless HR professionals who work there, you know who you are, you know you could be so much better (good few on that list) just know that the landscape is slowly changing and you will ultimately get called out.
      4
      • Avatar
        It can’t all be profits over people there is a least one firm not making any.:lol:
        0
  • Avatar
    Frustrated non-legal Wednesday, 28 February 2018
    The gender inequality is not limited to the legal teams.

    Imagine how it feels to be the BD/Marketing woman (you can bet your salary on it being a female) who writes these applications and awards when you know your firm is all talk and no action. While BD/Marketing teams are predominantly female, it is the males who are paid more and given promotion opportunities despite being less qualified.
    5
  • Avatar
    As someone who previously worked at one of the global firms listed, I cannot disagree more. While my team was "supportive" of me working flexibly, I would regularly get passed over on work that I was far more qualified for than my male colleagues. I was also paid significantly less than my male colleagues (including one 3 years my junior) and when I raised that I was being paid well below market, I was told that I shouldn't hold my breath for anything to happen. And at another firm listed, the moment a friend told her partner she was pregnant, she was relegated to discovery and non-billable work. Both of us have since left those firms. What a waste of experience.
    6
  • Avatar
    I am always sceptical of these organisations that say they promote women. I do not think they realise the harm they actually do.

    Take the Women Lawyers Association of NSW as another example. The President of which, Holly Lam, works for HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (who luckily didn't get a WGEA citation) who in turn are being sued by a former female partner for discrimination on the grounds of sex. HWL Ebsworth Lawyers also had that unfortunate issue of employing and then sacking a female graduate before she could start. Now, call me sceptical, but if you really were all for "trail blazing women in the law" and not about raising your own profile and doing it for the CV, how as a President of that organisation can you possibly sit back, keep working at HWL, taking a salary from them, and then front up to events.
    13
    • Avatar
      From my experience the partners of HWL Ebsworth won't be losing any sleep over not being in the list. As long as the $$ keeps coming in they just shut up and say nothing. Every bit of luck to those that push back- you'll soon find yourself looking for a new job. Moneys not everything folks.
      2
  • Avatar
    I heard the Law Society of NSW got a citation - if this is true then women lawyers of NSW might as well go and surrender their practising certificates right now.
    11
  • Avatar
    WGEA if you really want to make your citations worth anything at all, then take the HR policies and token committee information these firms supply via their BD departments with a pinch of salt.

    To get any sort of real picture conduct random anonymous unidentifiable surveys with the women actually working at these firms. It really annoys me that WGEA awards such citations without doing proper due diligence.

    The citations awarded do a disservice to the women working at these firms (as nothing for them will now change as there is nothing to encourage the firm to do so having obtained the citation) and makes the problem worse as the firm gets your citation, hides behind it, lures more women into working into an anti-women environment by advertising they have it, and fools more clients into buy in at tender time. Creates a totally circular situation where the only losers are women.

    Another initiative probably well meant but one that does not work and is actually to the detriment of women.
    12
  • Avatar
    As a female working at one of these firms, I call bullsh!t. Whilst numbers wise my firm may appear to do the right thing by having a decent number of women in higher level roles and having diversity committees and women's committees etc, these are very much token steps. Nothing truly changes.

    I stumbled across the salaries for the entire firm (whoops to the person who failed to save it on the confidential server!) and I now have evidence that bar the odd exception, men are on larger salaries yet are billing less than the women in their teams.

    Before anyone asks, yes I did speak to my partner (who is an equity partner) and seek to negotiate a salary increase, indicating that I was aware of what several males at my level in my team are earning (not saying how I was aware) and expressing my disappointment at the disparity given I work harder and bill more. Whilst he agreed with everything I said, he said he couldn't do anything as it was a firm decision. What a cop out. Needless to say, I am now looking to move on.
    14
  • Avatar
    This list is an all time joke. Maurice Blackburn were sued by a blind female employee for discrimination in late 2016. NRF were also sued by a former Perth partner in 2017.
    12
    • Avatar
      Don't forget NRF, is the defendant in a $100m gender bias law suit in the US following its other wildly successful 'combination' with Chadbourne Park.

      Oh and lest not forget, NRF was also sued by a female London associate in 2016 for bullying and personal injury.

      Top marks to WGEA for including NRF on the list.
      10
Avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!