Merger law changes stem controversy
Merger law is set for an overhaul and lawyers are gearing up for big changes in 2010. _x000D_
MERGER law is set for an overhaul and lawyers are gearing up for big changes in 2010.
The introduction of the Trade Practices Amendment (Material Lessening of Competition - Richmond Amendment) Bill 2009 to the Senate late last year will drive changes in the way, and how, mergers are approved.
The Bill, if passed, will mean major changes to the way the competition aspects of a proposed merger are assessed. The Trade Practices Act will be amended to ban any acquisition or merger that could have a noticeably negative affect on competition in a market.
According to Brett Bolton, a specialist in competition and trade practices law at HopgoodGanim Lawyers, this could result in a significant reduction in the number of mergers and acquisitions approved by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission each year.
“The rationale for the Bill is that the current laws are too lenient, meaning that a number of controversial mergers have been approved in recent times. Currently, around 97 per cent of mergers are approved”, Bolton said.
The amendments are designed to protect small businesses and consumers from large corporations who try to constantly increase their market share, creating highly concentrated markets and stifling competition.
However, the Bill could endanger the ability of Australian companies to grow and compete in the international marketplace.
Opponents of the Bill argue that the current merger laws have enabled Australian firms to grow to a size where they can effectively compete with larger overseas corporations, and that any change to these laws will jeopardise this growth.
"It will be interesting to see how the amendments affect mergers and acquisitions, and what this will mean for the future of such a vital component of Australia's economic efficiency”, Bolton said.
The Bill also proposes amendments that would stop corporations with substantial market share from buying shares or assets, if this could reduce competition in a market.
These changes are designed to address a loophole in the current law that allows companies, particularly the large supermarket chains, to make a series of small acquisitions, which can have a significant cumulative effect.
The Bill is currently under review by the Senate Economics Legislation Committee, which is due to provide its report on 18 March 2010.