Legal procurement must go “corporate”
Commonwealth agencies should adopt the practices of large corporations to mitigate the costly culture of legal services procurement in Australia, found the Commonwealth Legal Services
Commonwealth agencies should adopt the practices of large corporations to mitigate the costly culture of legal services procurement in Australia, found the Commonwealth Legal Services Procurement report released Friday by Attorney-General Robert McClelland.
The report also found that in-house legal practices should act to "professionalise" their service delivery and, where appropriate, adopt the practices of larger corporation in order to manage legal services procurement.
It also cited a general lack of attention and strategic direction of legal services management and a lack of reliable data on the demand for, and cost of, legal services across the Commonwealth and found that redefining the role of in-house lawyers in agencies could help.
McClelland said in a statement on Monday that the conclusions of the report were clear, namely that "the current system of agencies individually tendering for legal services is very costly both to the Commonwealth and to external service providers".
In response to the release of the report, Shadow Attorney-General George Brandis SC said that the Rudd Government must still halve its legal expenditure this year to meet a 2007 election promise that $15 million would be cut from the Government's legal expenditure.
Check back with Lawyers Weekly for more updates on this story
See the full report here