Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

Australia needs to accept Indigenous law regimes as capable systems, barrister argues

There is a need for a conversation around how native title can coexist with the national land management system scheme and the respect deserved for Indigenous peoples.

user iconNaomi Neilson 30 September 2019 Big Law
Raelene Webb QC

Source: murraychamberswa.com.au/barristers/raelene-webb-qc/

expand image

Raelene Webb QC, a barrister of Murray Chambers in Western Australia, argues there is a need to revisit the notion of Indigenous authority in the areas of Indigenous people holding land and governing their own societies according to their law.

Ms Webb said the key is “to build within the broader Australian community” by having a willingness to acknowledge resilience of Indigenous people, respect for their unique cultures, protocols, practices and traditions, as well as reciprocity for communities: “It is fundamentally a matter of equality and mutual respect for difference.”

“At its heart, this approach embraces legal pluralism and the acceptance of Indigenous law regimes as have been, and continue to be, flexible systems of governance capable of adapting to the changing needs and realities of the societies they govern,” she said.

Ms Webb said from an Indigenous view, under traditional laws and customs, the rights to exclude others and control access remain. Australian law does not recognise those rights “because the Crown has exercised its power to grant rights to others” which has extinguished any exclusivity of the native title.

“There have been different views expressed by the High Court judges as to whether native title would enjoy the protection of a provision. If it does, then it may be arguable that certain restrictions on compensation in the Native Title Act are unconstitutional,” Ms Webb said.

Aside from these legal issues, Ms Webb said litigating a compensation claim has been significantly more complex than litigating a native title determination approach.

She added the spectre of “complex, lengthy and expensive” native title compensation claims provided a reason and an opportunity for government to holistically re-examine relationships with Indigenous people and to examine how the dispossession of land harm can be best addressed to the “benefit of all”.

“Understanding these basic facts, that Indigenous societies hold land and govern their societies according to their law, strengthens the need to revisit the notion of Indigenous authority in these areas and Indigenous sovereignty that coexists with that of the Crown, but is not averse to it,” she said.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Naomi Neilson

Naomi Neilson

Naomi Neilson is a senior journalist with a focus on court reporting for Lawyers Weekly. 

You can email Naomi at: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Tags
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!