Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

IP reforms a solid win for business

The Commonwealth government’s much maligned Innovation Strategy looks to have kicked a goal with the release of government response to the Productivity Commission’s recommendations into IP law reform, writes James Lawrence.

user iconEmma Musgrave 04 September 2017 Big Law
James Lawrence
expand image

The government’s proposed response would remove a number of current roadblocks to innovation and raise the bar for those seeking to commercialise their ideas.

Heading up the reforms is the abolition of the troubled innovation patent scheme, introduced in 2001, which intended to encourage innovation by allowing inventors to access a shorter term patent for those inventions which could not meet with inventive step requirements for a standard 20-year term patent.

These patents were relatively easy to get and notorious for stifling innovation from competitors working in a similar area. The demise of these patents will be unlamented by most.

On a similar note, the inventive step test for standard patent applications is set to be further increased, which brings Australia in line with the corresponding provisions in the EU and the UK. This is a positive development beyond those established by the Raising the Bar legislation in 2012, and will improve competitiveness and bring better quality concepts to market.

On the copyright front, the decision to extend the safe harbour scheme to all online service providers will be controversial. In short, this means that the likes of YouTube, Facebook and Google can’t be held liable for users uploading infringing material onto these services. We will hear more about this one.

The government has decided against introducing a general fair use exception to copyright, as exists in the US. The current, rather limited, exceptions for fair use in Australia, such as review or parody, will remain.

The trademark reforms to parallel imports are sensible and will be welcomed by retailers. If a supermarket chain, for example, wishes to import a particular branded product from overseas because it is cheaper than sourcing the same product locally, they will be able to do this under the proposed changes without fear of trademark infringement.

And finally, it is proposed that the use of IP licensing and related agreements will be capable of constituting a breach of the restrictive trade practices provisions, which will no doubt provide the ACCC with a useful new line of attack.

This is a major suite of changes and while some elements will be hotly contested, the overall impact will be an important step forward for innovation.

James Lawrence is an IP partner at national law firm Mills Oakley.

Emma Musgrave

Emma Musgrave

Emma Musgrave (née Ryan) is the managing editor, professional services at Momentum Media.

Emma has worked for Momentum Media since 2015, including five years spent as the editor of the company's legal brand - Lawyers Weekly. Throughout her time at Momentum, she has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest stories in corporate Australia. In addition, she has produced exclusive multimedia and event content related to the company's respective brands and audiences. 

Prior to joining Momentum Media, Emma worked in breakfast radio, delivering news to the Central West region of NSW, before taking on a radio journalist role at Southern Cross Austereo, based in Townsville, North Queensland.

She holds a Bachelor of Communications (Journalism) degree from Charles Sturt University. 

Email Emma on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!